Planted origin of shade trees: a robust determinant of cocoa yield among smallholder farmers in Cote d'Ivoire
ADJI, B. I.; Assiri, A. A.; Assi, M. E.; Kassin, K. E.; Doffou, S. A.
Show abstract
CONTEXT: While the agroeconomic literature on the determinants of cocoa yield among West African smallholders is abundant, it remains dominated by descriptive studies or work conducted at an aggregated regional scale, leaving open the question of the role of shade-tree management practices at the scale of the individual plantation. OBJECTIVE: This study tests whether shade-tree management practices and the farmer's socio-demographic profile explain variation in cocoa yield, using a nationwide sample of 409 plantations covering, for the first time, the three major Ivorian production zones (loops) (98, 151 and 160 plantations for loops 1, 2 and 3, respectively). METHODS: A univariate screening of 27 variables, a mixed model with a random intercept by village, a production-function specification, LASSO variable selection, and a random forest were applied, all evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The five approaches converge on a robust result: the deliberately planted origin of shade trees (as opposed to a residual or spontaneous origin) is the strongest and most stable determinant of yield, with a mean gap of 332 versus 183 kg/ha/year. This effect withstands four successive robustness checks: it remains significant after simultaneous adjustment for age, plantation size, production zone, technical extension, and farmer education; it is not driven by a handful of extreme plantations; it holds within each of the three production zones taken separately rather than in only one of them; and, taken in isolation, it retains a positive out-of-sample predictive power (cross-validated R2=8776; 0.05). A second group of robust determinants of more modest magnitude emerges for agricultural technical extension (ANADER/CNRA/SATMACI) and farmer education level; shade-tree alignment shows a signal in the same direction, consistent with recent independent work in Cote d'Ivoire, but becomes statistically marginal once adjusted for these other factors. The full multivariate model reaches a cross-validated R2 of around 0.07-0.08. SIGNIFICANCE: This signal, undetectable in an analysis restricted to loop 1 alone (n=98) for lack of statistical power, confirms the value of nationwide sampling for detecting modest but real agronomic determinants, and argues for integrating shade-tree origin into agroforestry extension programmes.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Forest fragmentation and impacts of intensive agriculture: responses from functional groups of the tree community 93%
- Methodological priorities in assessing wild edible plant knowledge and use: a case study among the Baka in Cameroon. 92%
- Agroecosystem resilience. A conceptual and methodological framework for evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Access to Scientific Literature by the Conservation Community 88%
- Nature representativeness in South American protected areas: Country contrasts and conservation priorities 88%
- A lack of open data standards for large infrastructure project hampers social-ecological research in the Brazilian Amazon 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prioritizing Neglected Food Species in Nutritional Studies Using Expert-Knowledge and Explainable AI 91%
- Big trees drive forest structure patterns across a lowland Amazon regrowth gradient 90%
- Predicting flowering time using integrated morphophysiological and genomic data with machine learning models 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.