Back

Selective nigrosome vulnerability in Parkinson's disease revealed by histology-anchored ultra-high-field quantitative MRI

Li, R.; Kirilina, E.; Bazin, P.-L.; Stige, K. E.; Unsgard, R.; Brammerloh, M.; Gylterud Kvalsgard, I.; Kristoffersen, A. L.; Berntsen, E. M.; Goa, P. E.; Damier, P.; Tzoulis, C.; Doan, T. P.

2026-09-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.24.754224 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Selective vulnerability is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD): post-mortem, dopamine-containing cell loss in the substantia nigra first and most severely affects calbindin-poor compartments termed nigrosomes. Testing this in vivo has been limited by circularity, as MRI studies have delineated nigrosomes from the same disease-related contrast they then measure. Here, we warp histology-derived, calbindin-validated probabilistic masks of nigrosomes 1-5 into a cohort-specific multimodal 7 Tesla quantitative MRI template, providing a degeneration-independent anatomical scaffold, in 28 patients with PD and 28 age- and sex-matched controls. In controls, nigrosomes differ from the surrounding nigral matrix in magnetic susceptibility and R1. PD shifts nigrosomal values upward relative to the matrix in susceptibility, R2*, and R1, concentrated in nigrosomes 1, 2, and 4, whereas whole-nigra analysis shows no group difference. Within the matrix, disease effects are largest caudally and emerge dorsally from the ventral tier, and susceptibility alterations in nigrosomes 1 and 4 track contralateral motor symptoms asymmetry. The multimodal pattern suggests that the detectable signal reflects predominantly secondary, iron-associated glial processes rather than neuronal loss itself. These findings recover the post-mortem spatial pattern of nigral vulnerability in vivo and establish a degeneration-independent framework for subregional nigral imaging in PD.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.