Ongoing brain state dynamics shape spontaneous awake reactivation and its relationship with memory
Kim, H.-W.; Xu, T.; Nenning, K.-H.; Franco, A. R.; D'Esposito, M.; Colcombe, S.; Milham, M.; Tambini, A.
Show abstract
Memory reactivation is thought to support memory consolidation, but how ongoing brain states shape awake reactivation and its relationship to memory remain poorly understood. Here, we asked whether spontaneous hippocampal-cortical reactivation during awake rest is embedded in ongoing brain state dynamics by examining its coupling with whole-brain activity patterns and infra-slow global signal (GS) fluctuations, and whether these dynamics shape its relationship to memory retention. Reactivation preferentially occurred during an internally oriented brain state characterized by default mode network activation and dorsal attention network suppression, as well as states that reinstated encoding-related visual activity. Reactivation also clustered around the peak of infra-slow GS fluctuations and in high GS amplitude time windows, features previously associated with lower arousal. Importantly, the relationship between reactivation and memory depended on the ongoing brain state: distinct whole-brain activity patterns expressed during reactivation were associated with opposing memory outcomes, while reactivation during high GS amplitude windows was positively associated with retention. Together, these findings show that awake memory reactivation is embedded in dynamic whole-brain states that may influence its memory outcome, suggesting that recurring brain states may provide favorable windows for awake memory consolidation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Switching on Behavioral and Neural Rhythmicity to Retrieve Memories When the Number of Retained Items Exceeds Four 95%
- Spatial memory performance is associated with region-specific coordination of hippocampo-cortical sleep oscillations 93%
- Contextual Prediction Errors Reorganize Episodic Memories in Time 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.