Back

Mapping the response of primary human chondrocytes to an osteoarthritis-relevant stimulus by single-cell RNA sequencing

Stuppy, S. R.; Shine, J.; D'Costa, S.; Fernandez Davila, J. G.; Yanke, A. B.; Loeser, R. F.; Burgess, J. D.; Phanstiel, D. H.; Diekman, B. O.

2026-09-29 genetics
10.64898/2026.09.24.754148 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To determine how fibronectin fragment (Fn-f), a matrikine that induces an osteoarthritis (OA)-like phenotype, reshapes chondrocyte states and transcriptional programs at single-cell resolution. Design: Primary human ankle chondrocytes from two cadaveric donors without OA were treated with PBS or purified recombinant Fn-f for 18 hours and profiled by single-cell RNA sequencing. Transcriptional states were characterized by marker genes and functional enrichment, compared with classifications used for OA chondrocytes, and evaluated for Fn-f-dependent changes in abundance and transcriptional programs. Results: Five transcriptionally distinct populations were identified with features that matched previous classifications of effector, inflammatory, pre-hypertrophic/fibrochondrocyte, reparative, and homeostatic chondrocytes. Fn-f markedly redistributed cells among these states, enriching inflammatory chondrocytes while reducing effector and reparative populations. Within transcriptional states, Fn-f differentially altered matrix/cartilage, inflammatory, and stress/immediate-early programs. These responses did not uniformly correspond to assigned subtype identities, demonstrating that transcriptional programs can be dynamically deployed across chondrocyte states. Conclusions: Controlled perturbations of healthy chondrocytes complement observational OA atlases by resolving stimulus-dependent changes in chondrocyte state abundance and transcriptional programs. Discordance between subtype annotations and dynamic functional programs further highlights the need for harmonized definitions of chondrocytes across phenotypic states.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.