Back

ST6Gal2 promotes α2,6-sialylation and aggressive phenotypes in neuroblastoma cells

Swami, L.; Mandadapu, P.; Lopez, M. E.; Vaughan, S. K.; Richardson, A. R.; Janmeda, P.; Hardiman, K. M.; Stafman, L. L.

2026-09-28 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.09.24.754123 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Its clinical behavior ranges from spontaneous regression to lethal, treatment-refractory disease. Aberrant 2,6-sialylation contributes to aggressive phenotypes in many cancers, but the role of ST6Gal2, a neural-enriched 2,6-sialyltransferase, in neuroblastoma is largely unexplored. Here, we examine the clinical and functional significance of ST6Gal2 in neuroblastoma. In two independent public cohorts (SEQC, n=498; Kocak, n=649), high ST6GAL2 expression was associated with significantly worse overall and event-free survival. In the SEQC cohort, ST6GAL2 expression was higher in high-risk and MYCN-amplified tumors, varied across International Neuroblastoma Staging System stages, and correlated positively with a mesenchymal transcriptional signature (Spearman {rho}=0.181). The mesenchymal correlation was reproduced in the Kocak cohort ({rho}=0.204). Stable shRNA-mediated knockdown of ST6GAL2 in SK-N-AS and SK-N-BE(2) cells reduced proliferation and viability, impaired wound closure, and decreased migration and invasion. In preliminary experiments in SK-N-AS cells, ST6GAL2 knockdown reduced binding of Sambucus nigra agglutinin, consistent with a role for ST6Gal2 in 2,6-sialylation. Together, these findings link ST6Gal2 expression to aggressive clinical and transcriptional features and pro-tumorigenic phenotypes in neuroblastoma and nominate ST6Gal2-mediated sialylation as a candidate pathway for mechanistic study.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.