Bridging the gap between omics and structural data: A framework for interpreting protein-RNA interaction specificity
Fauconnet, Y.; Deng, S.; Koundri, R.; Pagani, M.; Quignot, C.; Antonio, D.; Andreani, J.
Show abstract
Protein-RNA interactions play a central role in many cellular processes, such as gene regulation, protein synthesis and viral infections. Although a few thousand protein-RNA complexes have been structurally characterized, they represent only a small fraction of all interactions. This lack of experimental data limits the ability of deep-learning based approaches such as AlphaFold3 to predict structures of protein-RNA interactions. In this study, we investigate protein-RNA binding specificity by enriching experimental structures with omics data. To this end, we present a scoring approach and associated web resource quantifying the agreement between experimental structures of protein-RNA interfaces and their omics-derived binding preferences, allowing us to identify interaction motif cores. Through key structural and evolutionary features, we further highlight that these motif cores correspond to important interface regions. We then leverage the dataset of protein-RNA complexes for which structural information can be combined with binding preferences in order to benchmark the ability of AlphaFold3 to predict protein-RNA interaction specificity. To this aim, we run AlphaFold3 predictions using different RNA inputs, from the exact sequence present in the experimental structure to a non-specific sequence, including sequences embedding the consensus binding motif from in vitro experiments. We show that despite good prediction quality, the sensitivity of AlphaFold3 to the exact RNA sequence used as input indicates signs of memorization. We examine some particular complexes and uncover challenges encountered by our scoring workflow and AlphaFold3, especially in the case of alternative binding modes. Altogether, this work evidences both the promise and current limitations of deep learning approaches for protein-RNA structure prediction, and provides a resource to guide their further development.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- UFold: Fast and Accurate RNA Secondary Structure Prediction with Deep Learning 95%
- IPANEMAP: Integrative Probing Analysis of Nucleic Acids Empowered by Multiple Accessibility Profiles 95%
- Cat_Wiz: A stereochemistry-guided toolkit for locating, diagnosing and annotating Mg2+ ions in RNA structures. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Augmented prediction of multi-species protein--RNA interactions using evolutionary conservation of RNA-binding proteins 94%
- Benchmarking Pre-trained Genomic Language Models for RNA Sequence-Related Predictive Applications 94%
- ERNIE-RNA: An RNA Language Model with Structure-enhanced Representations 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.