Back

AI-Guided Multi-Objective Engineering of Glucoamylase Enables Acidification-Free Starch Saccharification

QIAO, J.; Ma, X.; Song, Y.; Deng, Q.; Ni, X.; Liu, G.; Meng, S.; Shi, F.; Deng, L.; Cui, H.; Li, X.

2026-09-24 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.09.24.753989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glucoamylase is essential for industrial starch saccharification, but the limited thermostability and near-neutral pH tolerance of fungal glucoamylases necessitate cooling and acidification of liquefied starch. Here, we developed an artificial intelligence-guided strategy to simultaneously improve the thermostability, pH tolerance, and catalytic activity of glucoamylase from Penicillium oxalicum (PoGA). Two property-specific machine-learning models, CASPE-T and CASPE-A, identified substitutions associated with thermostability and pH tolerance, respectively. Experimental screening identified beneficial substitutions in 11 of 21 CASPE-T and 12 of 22 CASPE-A candidates. Folding-energy-guided recombination integrated the two traits while maintaining structural compatibility. The optimal variant, PoGA T513E/Q305N, exhibited 2.21-fold higher specific activity than the wild type, with half-life extended from 22.3 to 57.9 min at 60 degrees C and from 16.6 to 64.7 min at pH 8.0. Molecular dynamics simulations attributed these improvements to reinforcement of high-occupancy hydrogen-bonding networks, suppression of conformational fluctuations in the linker and carbohydrate-binding module, enhanced long-range dynamic coordination, and preservation of a compact catalytic architecture. At 60 degrees C and pH 6.5 without acidification, PoGA T513E/Q305N produced 219.9 g/L glucose and achieved 89.1% starch conversion, 31.4% higher than the wild type. This work provides an efficient framework for multi-objective enzyme engineering and sustainable starch biorefining.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.