Platform-specific count-matrix preprocessing workflows for spatial transcriptomics data analysis
Du, Y.; Li, S.; Yang, X.; Shu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zou, Q.; Yuan, Z.
Show abstract
Preprocessing of spatial transcriptomics (ST) count matrices is critical for removing technical variation while preserving biological signals, but optimal strategies remain unclear across diverse platforms. We systematically benchmarked 371 preprocessing workflows across 45 data spanning 11 mainstream ST platforms, evaluating their performance using specifically designed complementary metrics. To further assess preprocessing factors upstream of count-matrix generation, we additionally evaluated image preprocessing, including cell segmentation and post-segmentation transcript processing, across representative imaging-based ST platforms. We found that no universal count-matrix preprocessing workflow performed optimally across all platforms, while data from the same platforms exhibited striking consistency in optimal count-matrix preprocessing workflows. We identified the key data structure characteristics and count-matrix preprocessing steps that critically influence preprocessing performance. We developed platform-specific and data structure-guided recommendations to assist users in selecting the optimal count-matrix preprocessing workflow, validated across a broader range of downstream tasks. We demonstrated that our data-driven recommendations uncover subtle biologically meaningful spatial patterns in new data that were obscured by suboptimal count-matrix preprocessing. Our findings suggest best practices for ST data count-matrix preprocessing.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CSRefiner: A lightweight framework for fine-tuning cell segmentation models with small datasets 94%
- STEAM: Spatial Transcriptomics Evaluation Algorithm and Metric for clustering performance 94%
- GALA: A Unified Landmark-Free Framework for Coarse-to-Fine Spatial Alignment Across Resolutions and Modalities in Spatial Transcriptomics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation and tuning of in situ transcriptomics image processing workflows with crowdsourced annotations 93%
- Histology-informed spatial domain identification through multi-view graph convolutional networks 93%
- OOPS: Object-Oriented Polarization Software for analysis of fluorescence polarization microscopy images 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.