Back

Sum-h2, enabling genetic discovery for deep learning-derived phenotypes through a fast evaluation framework and arena of performance

Xia, T.; Xie, Z.; Zhao, X.; Islam, S. M. S.; Naseri, A.; Fan, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhi, D.

2026-09-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.24.753959 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the recent growing interest of AI research toward biology, genetic association studies of AI- derived phenotypes from high-content modalities such as images emerges as a powerful means for biological discovery. However, such AI-phenotyping methods still lacks a good optimization target and an efficient evaluation framework. The number of discovered loci was the major criterion for evaluating the quality of AI-derived phenotypes. However, the time and computational resources required for running the GWAS and subsequent loci-clumping are substantial, limiting the rapid development and iteration of deep learning representation algorithms. Here we present a 1000x faster and lightweight framework, sum-h2, than traditional GWAS framework for evaluating genetic discovery through total heritability. We revisit tr(P^(-1) G), previously proposed in the context of evolutionary studies, as a measure of multi-phenotype heritability. We showed that sum-h2, the sum of heritability over phenotypic Principal Components (PCs), is equivalent to the linear transformation-invariant tr(P^(-1) G), through both theoretical proof and simulation studies. Moreover, sum-h2 can be estimated rapidly with minimal information loss over a relatedness-enriched sample, while preserving the relative ranking of endophenotypes by GWAS loci counts. Based on selected UKB data and sum-h2, we set up a Genetic Discovery Arena, enabling rapid and fair comparisons for the development and optimization of deep learning-derived phenotyping methods.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.