Back

Acute ClC-2 blockade increases neuronal intracellular chloride and depolarizes EGABA

Shiu, F. H.; Dzhala, V. I.; Lillis, K.; Staley, K. J.

2026-09-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.24.753897 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neuronal intracellular chloride concentration shapes the polarity and strength of GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition. ClC-2 is a hyperpolarization-activated chloride channel proposed to support chloride extrusion, but its acute contribution to EGABA and neuronal chloride homeostasis remains incompletely understood. Here, we used the selective ClC-2 inhibitor AK-42 to test how acute ClC-2 inhibition affects GABAergic chloride signaling in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. We combined targeted single-interneuron optogenetic activation of stCoChR-expressing GABAergic interneurons with gramicidin-perforated patch recordings to measure optogenetically evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents and calculate EGABA and we used SuperClomeleon imaging to measure neuronal intracellular chloride. AK-42 depolarized EGABA, with a larger effect when stimulation was delivered 2 s rather than 100 ms after voltage-step onset. This delay-dependent effect is consistent with greater engagement of voltage- and time-dependent ClC-2 activity during prolonged voltage steps. AK-42 also abolished the more hyperpolarized EGABA normally measured at the 2-s stimulation delay and shifted baseline holding currents at hyperpolarized command potentials without measurably changing estimated resting membrane potential. SuperClomeleon imaging showed that AK-42 increased neuronal intracellular chloride in the presence of TTX, supporting a role for ClC-2 in basal chloride regulation. Together, these findings show that acute ClC-2 inhibition depolarizes EGABA, increases neuronal intracellular chloride, and alters the temporal dynamics of GABAergic chloride signaling, identifying ClC-2 as an acute regulator of synaptic GABAergic chloride signaling.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.