Conjunctive Targeting Links Drug Synergy to Emergent Proteome Structural States
Cheng, G.; Soliymani, R.; Gholizadeh, E.; Behrouzi, P.; Muhaddesi, M.; Renkonen, R.; Varjosalo, M.; Saei, A. A.; Jafari, M.
Show abstract
Combinatorial therapies are widely used in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to address disease heterogeneity, adaptive resistance, and rewired signaling and metabolic states. Yet drug prioritization remains largely guided by clinical or phenotypic evidence, while the molecular mechanisms underlying effective drug combinations remain incompletely defined. To narrow this gap, we developed Combinatorial high-ratio Partial proteolysis with reference PRoteome Analysis (CoPPRA), a structural proteomics workflow based on limited proteolysis of cell lysates that profiles drug-associated changes in regional protein accessibility at peptide-level resolution. Here, we applied CoPPRA to ruxolitinib and ulixertinib, individually and in combination, in AML-related cell lysates. Our findings extend conjunctive targeting (CT), a recently proposed mechanism of combinatorial drug action in which combined exposure produces protein targeting patterns not observed with either drug alone. Previously identified through combination-associated changes in protein solubility/stability, CT is examined here at peptide-level resolution through regional differences in proteolytic accessibility. The ruxolitinib-ulixertinib combination produced broad peptide-level accessibility changes, including a subset meeting the predefined criteria for CT. CT candidates predominantly exhibited regional accessibility changes, with altered peptide regions occurring against comparatively small changes across the remaining quantified peptides from the same proteins. MAP2K1 and ATP6V1G1 showed pronounced differences between overlapping peptide sequences, highlighting localized variation in combination-associated accessibility, including an ATP6V1G1 peptide mapping to an annotated helical region. Combination-associated increases in peptide signals were also observed in PIK3R1, BRD4, and PTPN11, linking regional accessibility changes to signaling and transcriptional regulators relevant to AML. Functional enrichment and network analyses further implicated nucleotide and glucose metabolism, ficolin-1-rich granules, ribosome-associated processes, and phagocytic vesicles. These results extend conjunctive targeting from protein-level solubility/stability changes to regional differences in proteolytic accessibility, showing that combination-associated effects can be concentrated within specific peptide regions rather than distributed uniformly across proteins. More broadly, CoPPRA provides a peptide-resolved approach for investigating the molecular features of combinatorial drug action and prioritizing protein regions for subsequent mechanistic validation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Mechanisms of Action in Combinatorial Therapies through Solubility Alterations: Advancing AML Treatment 98%
- Proteogenomics refines the molecular classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia 93%
- Simultaneous proteome localization and turnover analysis reveals spatiotemporal dynamics of unfolded protein responses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitive determination of proteolytic proteoforms in limited microscale proteome samples 93%
- Generalizable direct protein sequencing with InstaNexus 91%
- Native size exclusion chromatography-based mass spectrometry (SEC-MS) identifies novel components of the Heat Shock Protein 90-dependent proteome 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multifaceted proteome analysis at solubility, redox, and expression dimensions for target identification 93%
- Mammalian Proteome Profiling Reveals Readers and Antireaders of Strand-Symmetric and -Asymmetric 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine-Modifications in DNA 90%
- Glyco-STORM: Nanoscale Mapping of the Cellular Glycosylation Landscape 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.