Back

Snurportin-1 maintains muscle niche integrity and myogenic progenitor homeostasis

Saracoglu, H. P.; Nashabat, M.; Kutlu, D. N.; Saribas, B.; Yilmaz, E.; Tur, S.; Kayserili, H.; Yaksi, E.; Nabavizadeh, N.; Escande-Beillard, N.

2026-09-29 genetics
10.64898/2026.09.24.749599 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Loss-of-function variants in SNUPN, encoding the nuclear import factor Snurportin-1 (SPN1) required for spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) transport, cause a recently described form of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD). However, the role of SPN1 in skeletal muscle homeostasis remains poorly understood, in part due to the lack of a suitable in vivo model. Here, we generated a zebrafish snupn loss-of-function model that recapitulates key features of the skeletal muscle phenotype observed in patients. Mutant larvae developed severe locomotor impairment by 6 days post-fertilization (dpf), accompanied by sarcomeric disorganization and impaired muscle fiber integrity. Transcriptomic profiling at 6 dpf revealed widespread alternative splicing and transcriptional dysregulation, with prominent alterations in extracellular matrix and basement membrane components, together with upregulation of stress- and inflammation-associated genes. Notably, these late-stage abnormalities were preceded by disruption of the muscle progenitor population at 2 dpf, with reduced Pax7 progenitor abundance and myogenic gene expression together with altered muscle differentiation and organization. Together, these findings identify SPN1 as a key regulator of skeletal muscle homeostasis linking RNA processing to extracellular niche integrity and myogenic progenitor maintenance. This zebrafish model provides an in vivo platform for dissecting LGMD-associated disease mechanisms and developing therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring muscle function and regenerative capacity.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.