Hybrid surveillance and Bayesian modelling to estimate brucellosis incidence in a livestock-keeping population in northern Tanzania
Holmes, A. L.; de Glanville, W. A.; Katiti, W. A.; Mendes, A. J. F.; Bodenham, R. F.; Lukambagire, A.; Mmbaga, B. T.; Rubach, M. P.; Crump, J. A.; Cleaveland, S.; Viana, M.; Halliday, J. E. B.
Show abstract
Brucellosis is a globally distributed and widely under-appreciated zoonotic bacterial disease that causes infertility and abortion in livestock and febrile illness in humans, sometimes with debilitating sequelae. Brucellosis incidence estimates typically focus on acute presentations and range from 50 to 100 per 100,000 people per year for endemic settings, showing marked variation within and between countries. Estimating brucellosis incidence in low-resource settings is complicated by lack of access to and utilisation of health care and high-quality diagnostic testing for many people in rural communities. To estimate brucellosis incidence in a pastoralist population in northern Tanzania, we developed a Bayesian model that integrates multiple data sources including diagnostic test results from a hospital-based prevalence study performed in 2016-2017, test sensitivity and specificity, and data from a community-based healthcare utilisation survey in 2019-2020. We show that this population experienced a high incidence of brucellosis with wide uncertainty, with estimates of 387.6 (95% HPDI: 103.3 - 903.5) illnesses per 100,000 people per year for the total population, 199.7 (95% HPDI: 16.2 - 584.6) for individuals aged >15 years, and 632.4 (95% HPDI: 180.1 - 1379.4) for children aged [≤]15 years. These incidence estimates were among the highest in the world to date. The wide density intervals for these incidence estimates reflect uncertainty in the underlying parameter values used. Sensitivity analyses show that healthcare utilisation influenced incidence estimates the most. This result indicates that accounting for low levels of healthcare utilisation is essential to avoid under-estimating disease incidence. Our findings illustrate that brucellosis is a frequent cause of illness in this population. Increased access to treatment, prevention, and accurate diagnostic testing would greatly improve understanding of brucellosis epidemiology and the health of many people living in similar at-risk communities.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling to infer the role of animals in gambiense human African trypanosomiasis transmission and elimination in DRC 94%
- Assessing the effect of insecticide-treated cattle on tsetse abundance and trypanosome transmission at the wildlife-livestock interface in Serengeti, Tanzania 94%
- Real-time projections of epidemic transmission and estimation of vaccination impact during an Ebola virus disease outbreak in the Eastern region of the Democratic Republic of Congo 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of emerging Plasmodium knowlesi on accurate diagnosis by light microscopy: a systematic review and modelling analysis 92%
- COVID-19 in Uganda: Predicting the impact of the disease and public health response on disease burden 92%
- Varying Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Accuracy by Regional Transmission Level and Demographics in Tanzania 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transmission network reconstruction for foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks incorporating farm-level covariates 94%
- Modelling the impact of larviciding as a supplementary malaria vector control intervention in rural south-eastern Tanzania: A district-level simulation study 93%
- Assessing the potential of plains zebra to maintain African horse sickness in the Western Cape Province, South Africa 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.