Back

Toward personalized and longitudinal antibiograms--a proof-of-concept for in vivo assessments of immunological-antibiotic-bacterial interactions

Iandiorio, M. J.; Ioannidis, A.; Kempaiah, P.; Fasina, F. O.; Madaki, P. D.; Fazio, J. C.; Fasina, M. M.; Rojas Gil, A. P.; Chatzipanagiotou, S.; Gerotziafas, G.; Hoogesteijn, A. L.; Fair, J. M.; Rivas, A. L.

2026-09-25 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.09.24.26363858 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: In vivo, temporal, and personalized data on immunological-antibiotic interactions may provide richer, earlier information that improves infection treatment. To test this hypothesis, we applied a proof-of-concept approach to evaluate a non-reductionist methodology. Methods: A non-reductionist, data-driven, pattern recognition-based combinatorial method that captures relationships was evaluated with blood leukocyte data collected from 401 individuals from Greece [n=331] and the US [n=70] who experienced sepsis, pneumonia, endocarditis, tuberculosis, syphilis, skin and soft tissue, intra-abdominal, or urinary tract infections associated with meningitis. Results: While ambiguity was observed when variables were measured in isolation by a reductionist alternative, ambiguity was prevented and hidden information was uncovered when complex dynamics were assessed by the non-reductionist method. The combinatorial approach grouped together observations that displayed similar immune profiles, distinguished those with different mortality risks, identified antibiotics that modulated specific leukocytes, differentiated two types of non-responsiveness (associated or not associated with antibiotics), and facilitated earlier and personalized evaluation of therapies. For instance, in tuberculosis, blood monocytes were modulated by isoniazid-related antimicrobials. Discussion: Across numerous syndromes, the non-reductionist method extracted more information from the same data than the reductionist alternative. If corroborated, non-reductionist methodologies may promote research and support personalized medicine.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.