Modelling pairwise and coalitional contests with reinforcement learning
Leimar, O.; Bshary, R.
Show abstract
Game theory in biology started as an attempt to model animal contests by making assumptions about the fitness costs individuals pay in aggressive interactions. Among the different approaches, a notable one is to construct mechanistic models, using assumptions about behaviours and cognitive processes. Reinforcement learning is an important cognitive process, and we use it here to model pairwise and coalitional contests. We study situations where territorial neighbours become so-called dear enemies. A defending individual can get help from a neighbour through a defender-neighbour coalition against a challenger attempting territory takeover. In our model, coalition members have an advantage in contests in terms of costs of aggression, with the challenger being exposed to aggression from both members and each member only receiving part of the aggression from the challenger. We find that notable costs of border conflicts between neighbours, together with substantial advantages for coalitions, favour intervention. Neighbours intervene when they can help weaker defenders, in this way avoiding costs of border renegotiation with a new and potentially stronger territory owner. We also introduce different forms of perceived costs into the model, which we show correspond to the range from pure mutual assessment to partial self-assessment.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Nothing better to do? Environment quality and the evolution of cooperation by partner choice 97%
- Correlations between stochastic endemic infection in multiple interacting subpopulations 96%
- STOCHASTIC ECO-EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF MULTIVARIATE TRAITS: A Framework for Modeling Population Processes Illustrated by the Study of Drifting G-Matrices 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.