Integrating bacterial and viral genomic information enhances and extends the machine learning predictions of bacteriophage activity against pathogenic Escherichia coli
Gally, D. L.; Brown, A. T.; Chalka, A.; Valdiviesoa, I. S.; Bellas, C.; Low, A. S.; Hossain, T.
Show abstract
The use of bacteriophage (phage) to treat bacterial infections is undergoing a resurgence due to the rise of antibiotic resistance. Pathogenic Escherichia coli, including extraintestinal pathotypes such as uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), pose a substantial clinical burden with the challenge of multi-drug resistance strains, making it important to progress alternative treatment options such as those based on phage. One major hurdle is selecting effective phage combinations against an infecting strain while accounting for the multiple mechanisms that determine phage susceptibility and bacterial resistance. We previously analysed over 9000 interactions between 31 phage and 314 sequenced E. coli and built machine learning models to predict phage activity against "unseen" E. coli based on these scores and bacterial genome sequence data. However, this approach did not leverage phage gene content, limiting its ability to generalise across phage. Here, we advance this framework by combining bacterial and phage pangenomes into a single predictive model, allowing gene content across related phage as well as bacteria to be incorporated as machine learning features. This unified approach increased predictive accuracy relative to the single-phage models and produced a single model capable of predicting previously unseen phage-E. coli interactions. In leave-phage-out analyses, it also predicted activity for phages whose interaction data were entirely excluded from training. The genomic features most consistently contributing to prediction included bacterial determinants of surface recognition and anti-phage defence, alongside phage-associated features, indicating that this combined model, termed "PanPhage", captures genetic information relevant to multiple stages of the phage-host interaction.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomics of Irish swine-derived Streptococcus suis: Population structure, prophages, and anti-viral defence mechanisms 92%
- Co-transfer of functionally interdependent genes contributes to genome mosaicism in lambdoid phages 92%
- Using pangenome variation graphs to improve mutation detection in a large DNA virus 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- MoCETSE: A mixture-of-convolutional experts and transformer-based model for predicting Gram-negative bacterial secreted effectors 93%
- VAMPr: VAriant Mapping and Prediction of antibiotic resistance via explainable features and machine learning 93%
- PhANNs, a fast and accurate tool and web server to classify phage structural proteins 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Empathi: Embedding-based Phage Protein Annotation Tool by Hierarchical Assignment 93%
- Strengthening Phage Resistance of Streptococcus thermophilus by Leveraging Complementary Defense Systems 93%
- Convolutional neural networks quantify antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with diagnostic grade accuracy and predict treatment response 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single capsid mutations modulating phage adsorption, persistence, and plaque morphology shape evolutionary trajectories in {Phi}X174 93%
- Bacteriophage {Phi}21s receptor-binding protein evolves new functions through destabilizing mutations that generate non-genetic phenotypic heterogeneity 91%
- Transcript degradation and codon usage regulate gene expression in a lytic phage 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Species-scale genomic analysis of S. aureus genes influencing phage host range and their relationships to virulence and antibiotic resistance genes 92%
- Mycobacterium phage Butters-encoded proteins contribute to host defense against viral attack 91%
- What makes a temperate phage an effective bacterial weapon? 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.