Back

Biosynthesis of prenylated flavonoids by two membrane-bound prenyltransferases in glandular trichomes of Macaranga tanarius.

Munakata, R.; Maeda, Y.; Shimizu, R.; Sugiyama, A.; Kumazawa, S.; Fukumoto, S.; Yazaki, K.

2026-09-24 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.09.23.753730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Macaranga tanarius (Euphorbiaceae), a myrmecophilic plant grown in subtropical countries, was identified as a source of Okinawan propolis, a honeybee product, which is glandular trichomes developed on the surface of the fruits. This tissue contains a high amount of characteristic geranylated flavonoids known as nymphaeols (nymphaeol A - C and isonymphaeol B), which exhibit strong antioxidant activity. In this study, we characterized the structure of glandular trichomes of M. tanarius, showing that they are sac-like structures containing drupelet-like aggregates of secretary cells, and a subcuticular cavity was also observed. From a cDNA library, we identified two prenyltransferase (PT) genes involved in biosynthesis of nymphaeols, and a PT gene grouped in a primary metabolic PT. Our biochemical experiments demonstrated that one of the former secondary metabolic PTs (MtPT1) is a B-ring-specific geranyltransferase for eriodictyol to yield nymphaeols B and isonymphaeol B. MtPT1 was unusual for a plant PT, an enzyme that yielded multiple reaction products. The other PT (MtPT3) transferred a geranyl moiety to the A-ring of eriodictyol to form nymphaeol A. Although dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) was not recognized as its prenyl donor substrate of eriodictyol, giving a B-ring geranylated eriodyctiol as the prenyl acceptor substrate, this enzyme used DMAPP to attach the prenyl moiety to the A-ring and produced nymphaeol C. These data suggest that M. tanarius has evolved its PT function to produce a diverse range of prenylated flavonoids using a limited set of genes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.