Integrating dedicated and opportunistic surveys to estimate seasonal common dolphin density off mainland Portugal
Klaassen, M.; Lindgren, F.; Fernandez, M.; Houldcroft, A.; Martins, M. P.; Correia, A. M.; Silva, I. M.; Oliveira, N.; Torres-Pereira, A.; Marcalo, A.; Martino, S.; Marques, T. A.; Alves, F.
Show abstract
1. Common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) are the most abundant cetaceans off mainland Portugal and a species of conservation and bycatch concern, so reliable abundance estimates are a management priority. Yet no single survey provides adequate spatiotemporal coverage: dedicated programmes offer sparse snapshots, while opportunistic programmes are spatially constrained by their routes. Integrating them is methodologically demanding, and the existing methods that do so in a single model estimate the density of animal groups, not of the individual animals that management often requires. 2. We develop a spatiotemporal marked log-Gaussian Cox process that integrates four structurally distinct surveys through a shared intensity surface, comprising environmental covariates, a latent spatial field, and survey-specific detection functions. Group size enters as a zero-truncated negative binomial mark with its own spatiotemporal field. We apply it to a dedicated aerial survey and three opportunistic ship-based programmes off mainland Portugal, comprising 162,514 km of on-effort transects and 1,756 sightings of 17,000 animals. We fit the model in a Bayesian framework with integrated nested Laplace approximations, yielding seasonally resolved group and animal density surfaces across the Portuguese Exclusive Economic Zone, and abundance estimates with fully propagated uncertainty. 3. Predicted animal density concentrated over the shelf and upper slope in every season, peaking northwest, and increased in shallower, cooler, more productive waters and over steeper seabed. Abundance nearly doubled from summer (77,000 [95% credible interval: 60,000, 98,000]) to winter (146,000 [99,000, 208,000]). Seasons shared 56% of the spatial field's variance, so effort from any programme in any season informed all others, and the seasonal contrast remained estimable despite uneven coverage. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our framework allows managers to combine dedicated surveys with existing platforms of opportunity to estimate animal density by season. Because group size is modelled explicitly, densities are estimated in animals rather than groups, as required for bycatch risk assessment and marine spatial planning. Because each survey enters through its own observation model, the approach accommodates programmes that differ in platform and protocol and transfers to any species or region where several surveys each cover part of a population.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling Avian Full Annual Cycle Distribution and Population Trends with Citizen Science Data 93%
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 93%
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-level migration modeling of North American birds through data integration with BirdFlow 92%
- Linking movement and dive data to prey distribution models: new insights in foraging behaviour and potential pitfalls of movement analyses 92%
- Movement-assisted localization from acoustic telemetry data 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Particle algorithms for animal movement modelling in autonomous receiver networks 93%
- Effects of sampling duration and intervals on confidence in population trend estimates 92%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using animal tracking for early detection of mass poisoning events 91%
- Prioritising the eradication of invasive species from island archipelagos with high reinvasion risk 91%
- Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of attacks around deaths of wolves: A statistical assessment of lethal control efficiency in France 92%
- Mark loss can strongly bias demographic rates in multi-state models: a case study with simulated and empirical datasets 92%
- Bird population trend analyses for a monitoring scheme with a highly structured sampling design 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.