Back

Functional Profiling of a Human Odorant Receptor Using Olfactory Cilia Links its Activation to Odor Quality

Lempert, E.; Omura, M.; Mina, R.; Feinstein, P.

2026-09-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.23.753647 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanism governing singular odorant receptor (OR) gene choice restricts each olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) to expressing a single OR allele from a repertoire of more than 1,100 receptor genes. Consequently, only a small fraction of OSNs express any given OR, limiting studies of OR function, axonal wiring, and odor coding. Here, we show that multimerizing a 21-bp homeodomain enhancer dramatically increases the probability of receptor choice. We engineered a single-copy Olfr151 minigene carrying a 9x21 enhancer and the human odorant receptor OR10G4, integrated at a genomic site distant from all endogenous OR clusters. This transgene drives singular OR10G4 expression in approximately 75% of OSNs and is accompanied by widespread reductions in endogenous Class I, Class II, and TAAR receptor transcripts and proteins, indicating that cis-regulatory elements govern the probability of OR selection. The abundance of OR10G4-expressing cilia enabled highly sensitive ligand screening using CELIA (Cilia-based Evaluation of Ligands and receptor InterActions). Profiling guaiacol derivatives revealed a strong correspondence among receptor activation, cAMP production, and published human psychophysical responses. Although OR10G4 responds to guaiacol-related odorants, multiple canonical vanilla odorants failed to activate the receptor, arguing against a primary role in vanilla perception. Instead, the lowest EC50 ligands were enriched for compounds human subjects described as smoky. Together, these findings link activation of a single human odorant receptor to a defined perceptual odor-quality dimension and establish a general strategy for decoding the molecular basis of human odor perception.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.