Utilizing single-cell data for per-cell type eQTL mapping in the human pancreas
Weidekamp, M. A.; Lorenz, K.; Elgamal, R.; HPAP Consortium, ; Kaestner, K. H.; Gaulton, K.; Grant, S. F.; Voight, B. F.
Show abstract
Aims/hypothesis The human pancreas is a central organ for metabolic regulation that is comprised of diverse cell types that uniquely contribute to its function. Previous studies have performed expression quantitative trail loci (eQTL) discovery in either whole pancreas or in pancreatic islets, but due to differences between pancreatic cell types, this approach does not reveal cell type-specific effects. In this study, we sought to either implicate the cell type of action for known eQTLs or identify new eQTLs that may have been masked in bulk studies by performing eQTL discovery in individual pancreatic cell types. Methods We clustered 153,018 single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from 71 pancreatic islet donors from the Human Pancreas Analysis Program (HPAP). We performed eQTL discovery in six pancreatic cell types using this resource directly. We further utilized this single cell resource as a reference to deconvolute bulk pancreatic RNA sequencing data from 305 Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) project donors and performed eQTL discovery in four pancreatic cell types. Finally, we performed fine-mapping and co-localization of pancreatic cell type eQTLs with metabolic GWAS to connect our findings to metabolic disease risk. Results From analyzing 71 individuals with single cell profiles, we identified 112 unique eGenes across six pancreatic cell types, 99 of which had been identified previously and 13 unique to this study. From the deconvoluted eQTLs, we identified 3,134 unique eGenes across four pancreatic cell types, 116 of which were unique to our study. Fine-mapping and co-localization of eQTLs with metabolic GWAS yielded key leads that warrant further investigation, such as the association of rs2168101 with LMO1 expression in alpha cells. Conclusions/interpretation We identified new signals that were previously not found in bulk pancreatic eQTL studies and potential cell type of action for several signals that were identified previously. Although there are limitations to the power, and therefore, discoverability of this study, it provides insights into how individual pancreatic cells differently contribute to metabolic disease.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intra- and inter-individual metabolic profiling highlights carnitine and lysophosphatidylcholine pathways as key molecular defects in type-2 diabetes 90%
- Exome Sequencing in Individuals with Isolated Biliary Atresia 90%
- Synteny: a high throughput web tool to streamline causal gene prioritisation and provide insight into protein function 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-read transcriptome assembly reveals vast transcriptional complexity in the placenta associated with metabolic and endocrine function 92%
- eQTL mapping in fetal-like pancreatic progenitor cells reveals early developmental insights into diabetes risk 91%
- A comprehensive study of metabolite genetics reveals strong pleiotropy and heterogeneity across time and context 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of exome variants and their metabolic impact in 6,716 American Indians from Southwest US 91%
- Inclusion bias affects common variant discovery and replication in a health-system linked biobank 90%
- Widespread recessive effects on common diseases in a cohort of 44,000 British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis with high autozygosity 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pancreatic progenitor epigenome maps prioritize type 2 diabetes risk genes with roles in development 91%
- Single cell transcriptome analysis defines heterogeneity of the murine pancreatic ductal tree 91%
- Leveraging inter-individual transcriptional correlation structure to infer discrete signaling mechanisms across metabolic tissues 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.