Differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses by biomarker-agnostic plasma proteomics using adaptive machine learning
Mueller-Reif, J. B.; Ackroyd, S.; Albrecht, V.; Weigert, M.; Korff, K.; Schebesta, A.-S.; Yoeli-Bik, R.; Siddiqui, M.; Rausch, A.; Zsiros, E.; Mann, M.; Lengyel, E.
Show abstract
Background: Pre-operative triage of adnexal masses with serum CA-125, HE4, and ultrasound (O-RADS) has limited accuracy, contributing to unnecessary surgery. We develop and validate a first of its kind, biomarker panel-free plasma proteomic classifier that distinguishes malignant from benign adnexal masses from a single blood draw, operating directly on discovery-mode mass spectrometry. Methods: In this multicenter prospective observational study, plasma from women with adnexal masses and from healthy controls at a large urban academic center (discovery and four validation cohorts) and an external academic center from another Urban-suburban area (external validation) was analyzed by data-independent-acquisition mass spectrometry (Orbitrap Astral), quantifying >1,000 proteins per sample. Cancerous (malignant, borderline adnexal mass, or metastasis to ovary) versus benign adnexal masses were classified with ADAPT-MS (Adaptive Diagnostic Architecture for Personalized Testing by Mass Spectrometry), which retrains an ElasticNet model for each sample based on the proteins measured. The primary outcome was discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]). Pre-operative O-RADS scores and serum CA-125 were compared and combined with proteomics on matched subsets. Findings: Using a discovery cohort (n=1062), an ADAPT-MS classifier, validated across five independent cohorts (n=623), achieved a summary AUC of 0.835 (cohort range 0.779-0.904). Among patients with pre-operative O-RADS (n=231), proteomics (AUC 0.852) was comparable to O-RADS alone (0.863) and combining them raised discrimination to 0.922. Proteomics outperformed serum CA-125 (0.915 versus 0.777; n=125) and proteome-derived ROMA-like and two-marker surrogates. Biologically, the classification-relevant proteins are enriched for host response proteins rather than tumor cell associated protein changes, comprising ECM remodeling, complement and innate immune response pathways. This explains good detection of tumor with heterogenous pathology and also metastasis to ovary. Interpretation: A single plasma proteomic measurement interpreted using adaptive machine learning discriminates malignant from benign adnexal masses with good internal and external validation, and is complementary to ultrasound, warranting prospective evaluation as a panel-free diagnostic adjunct to imaging.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 89%
- Public evidence on AI products for digital pathology 89%
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Classifying HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry Slides and Implications for HER2-Low Cases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteogenomic Characterization of Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma Reveals Molecular Features of Progression and Chemotherapy Response 92%
- Mass spectrometry based qualification ofantibodies for plasma proteomics. 91%
- Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer 93%
- Minimal Correlation but Complementary Diagnostic Utility for Plasma Cell-free RNA and Proteins 92%
- Machine learning-based proteogenomic data modeling identifies circulating plasma biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.