A Distal-Proximal Gradient of Hebbian Plasticity in the Human Arm
Lee, M.; Farley, M. T.; Chen, B.; Sangari, S.; Perez, M. A.
Show abstract
Corticospinal-motoneuronal connections are more prominent in distal than proximal upper-limb muscles, but whether this anatomical specialization influences the capacity for activity-dependent plasticity remains unknown. Here, we tested whether Hebbian stimulation targeting corticospinal-motoneuronal connections, induces muscle-specific plasticity in proximal and distal arm muscles in healthy humans. We applied a spike-timing-dependent stimulation protocol comprising 180 paired stimuli, with transcranial magnetic stimulation timed to evoke corticospinal volleys 1-2 ms before motoneurons were antidromically activated by electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus for the biceps brachii or the ulnar nerve for the first dorsal interosseous (FDI). Corticospinal excitability was assessed by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before and 30 min after stimulation. Hebbian stimulation increased MEP amplitudes in both muscles, but facilitation was greater in the FDI than in the biceps. Because resting motor threshold was higher for the biceps than for the FDI, in a control experiment we matched stimulation intensities between muscles. Under these conditions, Hebbian stimulation continued producing greater facilitation in the FDI than in the biceps, indicating that the difference was not attributable to stimulation intensity. Moreover, changes in MEP amplitude were associated with maximal MEP size in the FDI but not in the biceps, whereas no muscle-specific association was observed with peripheral responses (M-max), supporting a stronger relationship between corticospinal drive and Hebbian plasticity in the distal than in the proximal arm muscle. Together, these findings identify a distal-to-proximal gradient in Hebbian plasticity across arm muscles, which may contribute to optimizing targeted neuromodulation approaches for upper-limb rehabilitation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The stretch-shortening cycle effect is not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations 95%
- Acute intermittent hypoxia-induced increases maximal motor unit discharge rates in people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury 95%
- Changes in intra- and interlimb reflexes from forelimb cutaneous afferents after staggered thoracic lateral hemisections during locomotion in cats 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modulation of leg trajectory by transcranial magnetic stimulation during walking 95%
- Tactile versus Motor Imagery: Differences in Corticospinal Excitability Assessed with single-pulse TMS 94%
- Plasticity of interhemispheric motor cortex connectivity induced by brain state-dependent cortico-cortical paired-associative stimulation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motor unit discharge properties of the vastii muscles and their modulation with contraction level depend on the knee-joint angle 93%
- In vivo characterization of Achilles subtendon function and morphology within the tendon cross section and along the free tendon 93%
- Eccentric exercise is not equal to eccentric contraction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation Enables Volitional Anti-Gravity Leg Movements After Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Responders vs. Non-Responders 94%
- Spatial mapping of posture-dependent resistance to passive displacement of the hypertonic arm post-stroke 93%
- Leveraging neural drive to assess hand motor function in individuals with chronic stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intensity-dependent corticospinal facilitation by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation: Evidence for a major contribution of group I afferents 97%
- The Human Motor Cortex Contributes to Gravity Compensation to Maintain Posture and During Reaching 95%
- Changes in Motor Unit Activity of Co-activated Muscles During Dynamic Force Field Adaptation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.