Back

Validation of an EEG-based Delirium Monitor in the ICU

Onyemekwu, C. A.; Karunakaran, S.; Armenta Salas, M.; Prendergast, N. T.; Toth, K. M.; Miller, M. D.; Lee, S.; Kamousi, B.; Mulkey, M. A.; Sadaka, F. G.; Striegel, T.; Girard, T. D.

2026-09-29 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.09.23.26361767 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose Delirium affects around 40% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and adversely affects survival, length of stay, and cognitive recovery. Despite this, implementation of systematic clinical delirium assessments is variable. We sought to validate a point-of-care electroencephalography (EEG)-based system (Ceribell, Inc.) for the detection of delirium in the ICU. Methods In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, we monitored adult ICU patients with the Ceribell EEG system for 6-8 hours for a minimum of three days. Up to three times per day, expert clinicians assessed participants for delirium and research coordinators completed Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) assessments, which we used to calculate CAM-ICU-7 severity scores. We compared expert clinician diagnoses with Ceribell EEG algorithm output using data from 30-minute periods surrounding each clinician assessment. Results Among 225 participants analyzed (median age: 64 years, 60% male, 21% mechanically ventilated), expert clinicians performed 857 assessments and found 24% of participants were delirious during at least one assessment. The Ceribell EEG system detected delirium with a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI: 76% to 87%) and specificity of 81% (95% CI: 78% to 84%). The continuous Ceribell EEG system score correlated with CAM-ICU-7 delirium severity scores (bootstrapped median rho 0.58, IQR: 0.54-0.62, p <0.001). Conclusion In a mixed adult ICU population, the Ceribell EEG system identified delirium with good sensitivity and specificity. Its continuous output was associated with delirium severity, highlighting its potential ability to characterize underlying physiological patterns across the clinical delirium spectrum.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.