Back

Tracking cellular biomolecular condensate dynamics under proteostatic stress with middle-down phosphoproteomics

Pandi, B.; Ng, D. C. M.; Schaal, P.; Alamillo, L.; Binti, S.; Lau, E.; Lam, M. P. Y.

2026-09-23 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.09.22.753649 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coordination of biological function requires the partition of cellular components including into biomolecular condensates, but an overall landscape of how protein compartmentalize into higher-order assemblies under stress is still emerging. We apply proteome-wide solubility profiling to compare the compositions of NP-40-insoluble proteins and their phosphorylation status, using a new mass spectrometry-based hybrid bottom-up and chemical middle-down proteomics approach to analyze the solubility behavior of 8,740 proteins and 31,647 phosphopeptides under normal and ER stress conditions. Cell stress induces a pervasive differential partition of proteins in and out of detergent-insoluble cellular compartments. This differential partition is partially orthogonal to stress-induced abundance changes and comprises both phosphorylation-dependent and phosphorylation-independent mechanisms. Whereas phosphorylation-independent partition changes involve largely secretory pathway proteins and implicate higher-order assemblies of chaperones and clients, phosphorylation-based partitions suggest a dynamic rearrangement of biomolecular condensate compositions across cytoplasmic and nuclear ribonucleoprotein assemblies. The accumulation of serine/arginine rich (SR) proteins and other annotated nuclear speckle members in the condensate-rich proteome fractions emerges as a central feature of stress-induced remodeling. Our results establish global solubility dynamics as an integral component of proteome stress response and implicates broad involvements of splice factor spatial reorganization as a prominent facet of ER stress response.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.