Designing spatial capture recapture surveys for multiple populations
Distiller, G.; Durbach, I.
Show abstract
Recent work on the design of spatial capture-recapture (SCR) studies has largely focused on settings with a single set of movement and detection parameters. In many applied contexts, however, populations are naturally stratified-for example, when different sexes exhibit markedly different movement scales and encounter processes, or when more than one focal species is monitored. Designs that perform well for one group may be inefficient or suboptimal for others, despite the substantial logistical effort typically required to implement an SCR survey. We describe several potential SCR design strategies for surveying multiple groups, and compare these using simulation. Designs considered include regular and optimised grids, clustered and lacework designs, and designs generated using genetic algorithms, including new approaches that optimise information from both groups and a recently published two-stage design. Using proximity detectors such as camera traps, we evaluate design performance in terms of precision, bias, and coverage, and examine how performance changes with the number of available resources. Our results show that multi-group SCR surveys can perform well even when focal groups differ greatly in movement scale and encounter rate, provided that some simple guidelines are followed. Systematic layouts accommodating more than one characteristic spacing e.g. cluster designs, performed consistently well and are a reliable default option. Regular grid designs with a single spacing between detectors are feasible when differences between groups are moderate but performed poorly as differences increased. Establishing when these designs become problematic adds unnecessary risk to the design process. Algorithmic designs did not outperform systematic designs even in highly-skewed scenarios expected to favour them. In practice, when there is more than one focal group we recommend identifying the smallest and largest plausible movement scales and rejecting potentially pathological designs, primarily those that cannot generate recaptures at the smaller scale or cover a substantial area at the larger scale.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of spatial overdispersion on confidence intervals for population density estimated by spatial capture-recapture 92%
- Accounting for observation biases associated with counts of young when estimating fecundity: case study on the arboreal-nesting red kite (Milvus milvus) 92%
- Unravelling the effects of heterogeneity in space use on estimates of connectivity and population size: Insights from spatial capture-recapture modelling 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Too few, too many, or just right? Optimizing sample sizes for population-level inferences in animal tracking projects 93%
- Failure to meet the exchangeability assumption in Bayesian multispecies occupancy models: Implications for study design 90%
- Population genetics meets ecology: a guide to individual-based simulations in continuous landscapes 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 93%
- An efficient method of evaluating multiple concurrent management actions on invasive populations 92%
- Modeling Avian Full Annual Cycle Distribution and Population Trends with Citizen Science Data 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.