Mitochondrial priming in human germ cell tumors is dependent on MCL1 and BCL2L1
Anniko, S.; Khan, S.; Morton, J. R.; Iftikhar, W.; Teixeira, A. A.; Willis, C. R.; Riches-Suman, K.; Poterlowicz, K.; Shnyder, S. D.; Mitchell, R. T.; El-Khamisy, S. F.; Allison, S. J.; Nicholls, P. K.
Show abstract
Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are highly sensitized to cell death in response to DNA damaging agents, a property that underlies the success of current chemotherapeutic regimens. To address the molecular basis for this, known as apoptotic priming, we evaluated how different BCL2 family members modulate the heightened sensitivity of GCTs to therapy. Our analysis of human GCTs finds consistently high expression of the pro-survival factors MCL1 and BCL2L1 (BCLX) in a cohort of primary tumors and in their embryonic precursor cells, frequently accompanied by copy number gains of these loci and reciprocal losses of their pro-apoptotic interaction partners and inhibitors, PMAIP1 (NOXA) and BAD. We find that co-inhibition of MCL1 and BCLX using selective BH3 mimetics results in a potent synthetic lethality in multiple GCT embryonal carcinoma cell lines. When these cell lines were cultured with the DNA damaging agents cisplatin or etoposide, inhibition of MCL1 or BCLX potentiated their apoptotic effect in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma cell lines, but not in retinoic acid-differentiated cells. The inhibition of MCL1 also heightened cisplatin sensitivity in p53-deficient or -mutant cell lines, which is associated with resistance to therapy. Employing an in ovo human xenograft model, we validate that the combination of cisplatin and MCL1 inhibition enhanced the therapeutic response by eliminating tumor cells. Our findings identify MCL1 and BCLX as critical factors to maintain GCT viability and as putative therapeutic targets to further augment GCT responsiveness to DNA damaging agents.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An inducible BRCA1 expression system with in vivo applicability uncovers activity of the combination of ATR and PARP inhibitors to overcome therapy resistance 92%
- APC Mutation marks an aggressive subtype of BRAF mutant colorectal cancers 92%
- Unraveling the heterogeneous mutational signature of spontaneously developing tumors in MLH1-/- mice 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ATR and PKMYT1 inhibition re-sensitize a subset of TNBC patient-derived models to carboplatin inducing mitotic catastrophe 93%
- MYC is sufficient to generate mid-life high-grade serous ovarian and uterine serous carcinomas in a p53-R270H mouse model 91%
- Drug-gene interaction screens coupled to tumour data analyses identify the most clinically-relevant cancer vulnerabilities driving sensitivity to PARP inhibition 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ovarian cancers with low CIP2A tumor expression constitute an APR-246 sensitive disease subtype 93%
- Targeting aggressive B-cell lymphomas through pharmacological activation of the mitochondrial protease OMA1 92%
- Small molecule mediated stabilization of PP2A modulates the Homologous Recombination pathway and potentiates DNA damage-induced cell death 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of Fanconi anemia proteins causes a reliance on lysosomal exocytosis 91%
- RET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Brain and RET Inhibitors Pralsetinib and Selpercatinib Suppress Breast Cancer Brain Metastases 91%
- Dedifferentiation-Driven Oncogenic Stemness Promotes Tumor-Sustaining Adaptability in the Intestinal Epithelium 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Platinum-Induced Ubiquitination of Phosphorylated H2AX by RING1A is Mediated by Replication Protein A in Ovarian Cancer 92%
- CHK2 inhibition provides a strategy to suppress hematological toxicity from PARP inhibitors. 92%
- PRMT5 maintains tumor stem cells to promote pediatric high-grade glioma tumorigenesis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.