RecallRefine: Coverage-Constrained Coarse-to-Fine Segmentationfor Small 3D Lesions
Chen, W.; Chen, J.
Show abstract
Coarse to fine segmentation is a natural strategy for three dimensional lesion delineation becausefull resolution processing of an entire scan is expensive while only a small fraction of the volume contains pathology. Its main failure mode, however, is structural: a lesion missed by the coarse stage is usually absent from the region of interest and therefore cannot be recovered by the fine stage. This problem is most severe for small, low contrast, and multifocal lesions. We introduce RECALLREFINE, a coverage constrained coarse to fine framework that treats candidate-region selection as a recall critical learning problem rather than a deterministic crop around the coarse mask.A full-volume network first predicts coarse lesion probabilities and multi-scale features. A candidate score network then combines coarse probability, predictive uncertainty, feature novelty, and spatial context to score overlapping 3D blocks. During training, a differentiable selector is optimized with a component-wise coverage objective that requires every annotated lesion instance to remain covered by at least one selected block under a fixed refinement budget. Selected blocks are processed at native resolution by a local refiner with a context-ring branch, and overlapping predictions are merged back into the full volume. Across four public 3D lesion benchmarks, RECALLREFINE improves mean tumor Dice from 76.5% for the strongest matched coarse-to-fine baseline to 78.4%, while increasing sensitivity for lesions below 10 mm from 60.9% to 70.8%.At a 20% candidate budget, the selector covers 94.4% of lesion instances, substantially reducing irreversible coarse-stage misses. The results suggest that the central problem in cascaded lesion segmentation is not only how to refine a detected lesion, but how to guarantee that difficult lesions are still represented in the refinement set.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ViFIT-assisted Histopathology: From H&E Style Standardization to Virtual Fiber Image Transformation 93%
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 93%
- A Framework for Falsifiable Explanations of Machine Learning Models with an Application in Computational Pathology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STPath: A Generative Foundation Model for Integrating Spatial Transcriptomics and Whole Slide Images 92%
- Understanding the robustness of vision-language models to medical image artefacts 92%
- A Clinical Neuroimaging Platform for Rapid, Automated Lesion Detection and Personalized Post-Stroke Outcome Prediction 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 92%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 92%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generative AI Enables Medical Image Segmentation in Ultra Low-Data Regimes 95%
- Features fusion or not: harnessing multiple pathological foundation models using Meta-Encoder for downstream tasks fine-tuning 92%
- Weakly supervised classification of rare aortic valve malformations using unlabeled cardiac MRI sequences 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.