An automated machine vision-based index for Rett Syndrome provides a generalizable framework for modeling rare disease therapeutics
Berger, M. L.; Simon, M.; Sabnis, G. S.; Lutz, C. M.; Kumar, V.
Show abstract
Rare diseases collectively affect millions of people, yet therapeutic development remains limited by preclinical phenotyping which is often dependent on subjective, low-resolution manual behavioral assessment. Rett syndrome (RTT), a rare disease affecting 1 in 10,000 female births, is caused by a MeCP2 deficiency. In mouse models for this disease, symptom severity is measured primarily with the observational Bird score. This subjective six-item ordinal scale was used to demonstrate that MeCP2 deficiency is reversible, but offers limited resolution for ranking candidate therapies or detecting partial rescue. We applied an automated machine learning (ML) pipeline to a humanized Mecp2 R270X mouse model. We conducted weekly Bird scoring and recorded one-hour open-field trials from 3 to 10 weeks of age in 24 hemizygous (Mecp2-/Y) males and 24 wild-type littermates, then extracted over 400 behavioral features spanning gait kinematics, open-field activity, body morphometrics, and trained behavior classifiers. Manual Bird scoring tracked overall disease trajectory, but most of its dynamic range derived from two of six items. In contrast, ML features separated genotypes as early as three weeks and identified disease-relevant behaviors not captured by the Bird protocol, including increased tail-tip amplitude, repetitive wall-directed jumping, and prolonged behavioral arrest. Sparse PLS-DA separated genotypes at every age tested. A composite score modeled from the ML features reproduced the temporal pattern of the total Bird score with substantially less variability. Subsampling analyses showed that the ML feature set reached 5% cross-validated genotype misclassification error with only 12 to 16 animals, whereas the Bird score did not reach the 5% threshold even with 44 animals before week 6, a reduction in animal use consistent with the 3Rs. Applied to a Mecp2 minigene rescue study, the composite score reproduced genotype separation in an independent cohort and detected both a partial shift of treated hemizygous survivors toward wild-type values and adverse effects of the construct in wild-type mice. These results establish an objective, high-resolution severity index for RTT and a generalizable framework for preclinical phenotyping in a rare disease.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging sequences missing from the human genome to diagnose cancer 90%
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 90%
- Pretrained Patient Trajectories for Adverse Drug Event Prediction Using Common Data Model-based Electronic Health Records 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Open-Source Tool for Automated Human-Level Circling Behavior Detection 91%
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 90%
- The application of Large Language Models to the phenotype-based prioritization of causative genes in rare disease patients 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early differential impact of MeCP2 mutations on functional networks in Rett syndrome patient-derived human cerebral organoids 92%
- Projecting genetic associations through gene expression patterns highlights disease etiology and drug mechanisms 91%
- Unveiling the crucial neuronal role of the proteasomal ATPase subunit gene PSMC5 in neurodevelopmental proteasomopathies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- De novo FZR1 loss-of-function variants cause developmental and epileptic encephalopathies including Myoclonic Atonic Epilepsy 91%
- Enhanced mGluR1 function causes motor deficits and region-specific Purkinje cell dysfunction 90%
- Heterozygous PRKN mutations are common but do not increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.