Back

Topology, Energy Landscapes and Folding Kinetics of RNA Hairpins

Verma, A. R.; Tiwary, P.; Qiu, Y.

2026-09-22 biophysics
10.64898/2026.09.21.753325 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many RNAs occupy multiple inter-converting structures in order to perform key biological functions. Characterizing RNA conformational ensembles is therefore critical to illuminating the mechanisms by which RNAs fold, unfold, and undergo precise structural rearrangements in response to cellular signals. However, resolving the equilibrium populations and folding kinetics of RNA ensembles is nontrivial due to the intrinsic ruggedness of RNA conformational landscapes and wide range of timescales spanned by RNA structural dynamics. To address these challenges, we present a de novo hierarchical multiscale computational framework that integrates diverse secondary and tertiary structure generation, adaptive unbiased molecular dynamics, a generative AI model termed latent thermodynamic flows (LaTF), and Markov state modeling to efficiently map global RNA folding landscapes and associated dynamics. Applied to the GCAA tetraloop, HIV-TAR stem-loop, and microROSE RNA thermometer, this framework yields ~ 1.3 ms of cumulative sampling and resolves temperature-dependent conformational landscapes comprising numerous native-like, misfolded, partially folded, and unfolded metastable states. Across all three RNA hairpins, temperature substantially reshapes landscape ruggedness, metastable state populations, and folding mechanisms. Our predicted ensembles show overall agreement with key static and dynamic biophysical observables, including Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)-resolved structures, Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE)-derived distance restraints, and residual dipolar couplings (RDCs). Together, these results establish a general physics-informed AI approach for accurately modeling RNA conformational heterogeneity, equilibrium thermodynamics, and long-timescale kinetics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.