Back

MINFLUX-nanoscopy of hNAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome activation in single human macrophages

Kulnik, S.; Westerkamp-Carsten, A.; Luebbe, J.; Yin, S.; Failla, A. V.; Aepfelbacher, M.

2026-09-22 cell biology
10.64898/2026.09.21.753160 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The biochemical and structural basis of NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome activation is well understood. Far less well known are the spatiotemporal processes within cells that play a role in the activation of the NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome. We used super-resolution imaging technology, including MINFLUX nanoscopy, to investigate the human hNAIP/hNLRC4 inflammasome in primary human macrophages following the phagocytosis of a specific Yersinia enterocolitica strain. hNAIP, which senses components of the bacterial type III secretion system (T3SS) and activates NLRC4, was recruited to bacteria-containing phagosomes after they were disrupted by the T3SS. Disruption of a single phagosome within a macrophage was sufficient to cause the accumulation of NLRC4 and NLRP3 (a sensor of another inflammasome), as well as the adapter protein ASC, in a dense condensate known as a speck. This subsequently led to plasma membrane permeation and pyroptosis. It appeared that, with increasing infection time, clusters containing NLRC4 and NLRP3/NLRC4 gradually acquired ASC for speck formation. MINFLUX-nanoscopy was able to visualise hNAIP at disrupted phagosomes with nanometre resolution, and also revealed the number and organisation of NLRC4 inflammasome discs within a speck, as well as their hNAIP content, for the first time. Surprisingly, the number of NLRC4 inflammasome discs varied considerably, ranging from 35 to 249 per speck. Also, only a small fraction of these seemed to contain hNAIP. Our results significantly improve our understanding of the process by which the hNAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome is activated in macrophages that have ingested bacteria containing a T3SS.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.