Back

VCP inhibition prevents cone photoreceptor degeneration in the cpfl1 mouse model of achromatopsia

Almansa-Garcia, A. C.; Cao, B.; Petremann-Dume, A. S.; Kilger, E.; Bolz, S.; Ueffing, M.; Arango-Gonzalez, B.

2026-09-26 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.21.753131 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Achromatopsia (ACHM) is a rare autosomal recessive retinal disorder characterized by absent cone photoreceptor function from early life, leading to severe visual impairment. Mutations in genes involved in the cone phototransduction cascade frequently result in elevated cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels and activation of stress pathways, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response. Targeting common downstream mechanisms rather than individual mutations may provide a broadly applicable therapeutic strategy. Here, we investigated whether pharmacological inhibition of valosin-containing protein (VCP), a key regulator of ER and protein homeostasis, can prevent cone degeneration in the spontaneous cone photoreceptor function loss 1 (cpfl1) mouse model of ACHM. Organotypic culture of retinal explants from cpfl1 mice were treated with the selective VCP inhibitor ML240. Cone survival, cell death, opsin expression and localization were assessed by TUNEL assay, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative image analysis. ML240 treatment significantly increased cone density and improved cone opsin expression and trafficking to the outer segments (OSs) in cpfl1 explants compared to controls. Importantly, rhodopsin trafficking in rod photoreceptors was unaffected, indicating that VCP inhibition did not impair normal rod phototransduction. These findings demonstrate that VCP inhibition by ML240 effectively preserves cone photoreceptors and improves cone-specific functional markers in the cpfl1 model. Targeting VCP may represent a mutation-independent therapeutic strategy for preventing cone death in ACHM.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.