Patellar tendon-tap intensity modulates response gain but not variability across cortical proprioceptive and stretch-reflex responses
Li, F.; Byman, A.; Chen, J.; Mujunen, T.; Piitulainen, H.
Show abstract
Cortical proprioceptive processing to passive movements can be quantified with evoked and induced responses in magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals. We examined how intensity of proprioceptive stimulation (i.e., tendon-tap evoked movement) scales cortical processing of proprioceptive afference from the knee joint, and whether it affects stimulus-to-stimulus response variability. Twenty-one healthy volunteers (28.2{+/-}5 yr, 10 females) underwent a total of 100 right patellar tendon taps (5.0--6.0s inter-stimulus interval) evoked by a novel MEG-compatible stimulator under higher and lower intensity conditions. Strength of cortical evoked and induced MEG and electromyographic responses from the vastus lateralis and medialis muscles were quantified, and their variability were assessed using a matched sliding-window coefficient of variation (CoV). Higher intensity stimulation elicited significantly stronger cortical evoked (~11%) and induced (~17% for beta suppression and ~18% for beta rebound) responses, and muscular response (~27%) than lower intensity stimulation (p<0.05). The stimulus intensity did not affect response variability, with comparable CoV values between higher and lower intensity condition (p>0.05), but the muscular responses showed greater variability than the cortical ones in both intensity conditions (CoV: ~30% vs. ~10%, p<0.001). In addition, the variability in cortical and muscular responses were not significantly correlated (p>0.05). Our results indicate that patellar tendon-tap intensity scaled cortical and muscular response gain, but did not measurably alter response variability. The distinct variability profiles of cortical evoked fields and stretch-reflex muscular response suggest that proprioceptive afference evoked by tendon-tap is transformed differently across cortical and spinal levels.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intensity-dependent corticospinal facilitation by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation: Evidence for a major contribution of group I afferents 94%
- Propagation of Beta bursts from the motor cortex to the motor units of multiple upper-limb muscles 93%
- Interindividual variations in peak alpha frequency do not predict the magnitude or extent of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high-frequency stimulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcallosal generation of phase aligned beta-bursts underlies TMS-induced interhemispheric inhibition 93%
- Effects of Electric Field Direction on TMS-based Motor Cortex Mapping 93%
- Characterising the contribution of auditory and somatosensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials following stimulation of prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortex 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lempel-Ziv complexity of simultaneous surface electromyography and magnetomyography during muscle fatigue 94%
- Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation 94%
- Enhanced selectivity of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation by multielectrode configuration 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.