OmiCoreTumorDetector: an open, molecularly validated model for mapping tumour regions in colorectal cancer H&E sections
Niwase, S.; Fujiyama, A.
Show abstract
Defining tumour regions on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections is a routine first step in spatial-omics studies, yet it is usually done by hand and is difficult to reproduce. We present OmiCoreTumorDetector, an openly licensed model that maps tumour-enriched regions in colorectal cancer (CRC) H&E sections and exports them as QuPath-compatible annotations. The released model (omicore-tumordetector-crc-he-v0.1) is an ensemble of three convolutional classifiers trained on 100,000 public tissue tiles, combined with Macenko stain normalisation at inference. During development we found that the main obstacle to reuse was calibration under stain-domain shift rather than discrimination: a single model kept an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.955 on unseen slides while its sensitivity at the conventional 0.5 threshold fell to 0.48. Training on non-normalised tiles raised tumour AUROC on an independently collected tile set from 0.836 to 0.992, and normalising at inference reduced false-positive tumour area in normal-adjacent tissue by 16- to 26-fold. On five 10x Visium HD CRC sections that share no material with the training data, the released model called 27.7-48.5% of tissue as tumour in three carcinoma sections and 0.08% and 1.82% in two normal-adjacent sections, exporting no tumour region from either normal section. On the carcinoma section with matched single-cell-resolution transcriptomics, agreement with transcriptome-derived tumour-cell identities reached an AUROC of 0.985 (95% spatial-block bootstrap CI 0.975-0.993). The image model never observes gene expression, so this is orthogonal evidence. The model localises tumour-enriched regions at 112 um resolution; it does not identify individual malignant cells and has not yet been validated across scanners, institutions or histological variants. Code, weights and evaluation are released under Apache-2.0 and installable with pip install omicoretumordetector.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmenting functional tissue units across human organs using community-driven development of generalizable machine learning algorithms 94%
- PHARAOH: A collaborative crowdsourcing platform for PHenotyping And Regional Analysis Of Histology 93%
- ROSIE: AI generation of multiplex immunofluorescence staining from histopathology images 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sardine: a modular framework for developing data acquisition and near real-time analysis applications 91%
- SAMCell: Generalized Label-Free Biological Cell Segmentation with Segment Anything 91%
- scAEGAN: Unification of Single-Cell Genomics Data by Adversarial Learning of Latent Space Correspondences 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.