Potential five-year life years associated with stage IV reductions in NHS Galleri Trial
Starasvetskaya, N.; de Lima Lopes Junior, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundNHS-Galleri did not reach its prespecified primary endpoint of a reduction in combined stage III and IV cases, but reported fewer stage IV cancers after annual multi-cancer early detection screening. We estimated the potential five-year life-years associated with the cancer-specific stage IV differences observed during the two incident screening rounds. MethodsWe used intervention and control stage IV counts for ten prespecified cancers reported in the NHS-Galleri ASCO 2026 presentation. For each cancer, the randomized-arm count difference was multiplied by the difference in five-year restricted mean survival time between stage III and IV, estimated from England stage-specific five-year net survival using a constant-hazard fit. Adverse cancer-specific differences remained in the model. Results were annualized across the two incident rounds and scaled per million people screened. Sampling intervals used an independent Poisson approximation for arm-specific counts. FindingsAcross the ten evaluable cancers, the intervention and control arms had 180 and 239 stage IV diagnoses during the incident rounds. The conditional projection was 66.3 potential life-years over five years in the trial intervention cohort, equivalent to 466 per million people screened annually (95% sampling interval 190-743). For a population of 10 million, the corresponding projection was 4,664 annually (1,896-7,432). Colorectal, lung, and esophageal cancers accounted for 79% of the net projection. Pancreatic, ovarian, and lymphoid cancers contributed negatively because their observed stage IV counts favored control. InterpretationIf the observed incident-round reduction in stage IV diagnoses represents true downstaging to stage III, it could produce meaningful population health gains. This conditional estimate is not evidence of mortality reduction. Longer follow-up remains necessary to distinguish benefit from chance, lead-time and length biases, overdiagnosis, and differences in tumor biology.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 92%
- Bayesian Interim Analysis and Efficiency of Phase III Randomized Trials 89%
- Immortal time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 89%
- Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: cohort study in OpenSAFELY using linked primary care, secondary care and death registration data 88%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction 90%
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 90%
- Risk factors for eight common cancers revealed from a phenome-wide Mendelian randomisation analysis of 378,142 cases and 485,715 controls 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 92%
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 92%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Repurposing cardiovascular disease prediction models for cancer 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life, physical and psychosocial wellbeing in breast cancer patients and survivors - A prospective, multicenter cohort study 88%
- Late immune-related adverse events in long-term responders to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: a multicentre study. 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.