Back

Association Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Derived Time in Range and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of current evidence

Lodha, S. M.; Kumar, S.; Acharya, S.; Dhamelia, P.; Garg, S.

2026-09-23 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.09.21.26363573 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundContinuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range (TIR; glucose 70-180 mg/dL) has emerged as a complementary glycemic metric, but its association with DKD (Diabetic Kidney Disease) has not been systematically quantified. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on the association between CGM-derived TIR and DKD in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence. MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched through March, 2026. Eligible studies were studies in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes that reported an association between CGM-derived TIR and any DKD outcome (albuminuria, eGFR decline, or composite nephropathy) with a quantifiable per-unit effect estimate. Random-effects meta-analysis (REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) pooled odds ratios per 10% TIR increment. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E and certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework. PROSPERO: CRD420261377763. ResultsEleven studies (n = 7,182; seven T2D, four T1D; ten cross-sectional, one retrospective cohort) were included. The pooled OR per 10% TIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.95; P = 0.002; I{superscript 2} = 69.6%), and every leave-one-out iteration preserved significance (OR range 0.88-0.91; all P [≤] 0.005). In the four studies adjusting for HbA1c, the association persisted (OR 0.91, 0.86-0.97; P = 0.015) with no detectable residual heterogeneity (I{superscript 2} = 0%), indicating the signal is not fully attributable to average glycemia. ConclusionsHigher CGM-derived TIR may be associated with lower odds of DKD (OR 0.89 per 10% increment). The HbA1c-adjusted subgroup (k = 4; I{superscript 2} = 0%) provided the most internally consistent signal, though its small size limits inference. Prospective studies with standardized CGM protocols and pre-specified hard kidney endpoints are needed to establish causality.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.