Finding Safety Signals in Sparse Data: Zero-Inflated Models for Pharmacovigilance studies
Man, M.; Cheng, V.; Cox, A. R.; Easter, C. L.; Jones, A. M.
Show abstract
Signal detection is a core task in pharmacovigilance, and disproportionality analysis (DA) remains the dominant approach for spontaneous reporting systems (SRS). However, SRS data are sparse and heavily zero-inflated, reflecting rare adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and substantial under-reporting, which can distort standard count-model assumptions. Using Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) interactive Drug Analysis Profiles (iDAPs) for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), we derived system organ class (SOC) level adverse event counts. Goodness-of-fit testing indicated that SOC counts were variably consistent with Poisson or negative binomial (NB) distributions, motivating the use of zero-inflated Poisson and zero-inflated NB models. Model adequacy was assessed using Pearson-residual dispersion (absolute fit) and Akaikes Information Criterion (relative fit). Zero-inflated models provided improved fit for 10 out of all 27 SOCs (Endocrine disorders, Immune system disorders, Metabolism and nutrition disorders, Infections and infestations, Renal and urinary disorders, Hepatobiliary disorders, Ear and labyrinth disorders, Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions, Congenital, familial and genetic disorders, Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps)) and yielded signals broadly concordant with DA, including for metabolism-related events. These results support zero-inflated modelling as a complementary signal detection method for iDAPs-derived count data, particularly where internal model-based validation and explicit handling of excess zeros are desired.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 94%
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 93%
- Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) as Novel Sources for Population-Based Post Marketing Surveillance of Medical Products: A Pilot Study from the FDA Sentinel Innovation Center 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pregnancy pharmacoepidemiology: How often are key methodological elements reported in publications? 90%
- INSIGHT: A Tool for Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Observational Data Sources for Real World Evidence on Medicine and Vaccine Safety 90%
- Bias amplification of unobserved confounding in pharmacoepidemiological studies using indication-based sampling: there is no free lunch in restricting the sample to those with a particular drug-indication 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DrugWAS: Leveraging drug-wide association studies to facilitate drug repurposing for COVID-19 92%
- MTXPK.org: A clinical decision support tool evaluating high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics to inform post-infusion care and use of glucarpidase 91%
- Innovative Randomized Phase 1 Study and Dosing Regimen Selection to Accelerate and Inform Pivotal COVID-19 Trial of Nirmatrelvir 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reported Drug Spectrum and Disproportionality Signals for Malignant Neoplasm Progression in FAERS: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study 93%
- Pharmacokinetics of caffeine: A systematic analysis of reported data for application in metabolic phenotyping and liver function testing 91%
- Informing Pharmacokinetic Models with Physiological Data: Oral Population Modeling of L-Serine in Humans 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.