A within-host-informed event-time framework linking epidemiological delay distributions
Jamieson, N.; Park, S. W.; Ainslie, K.; Xu, J.; Funk, S.; Ward, T.; Overton, C. E.; Meyers, L. A.; Abbott, S.
Show abstract
Understanding when and how pathogens spread from person to person is fundamental to characterizing transmission, interpreting surveillance data, and designing effective control measures. Yet key epidemiological delays -- including the latent period, incubation period, generation interval, and serial interval -- are difficult to estimate because key events such as infection, infectiousness, symptom onset, and transmission are rarely observed directly. Current approaches typically estimate these delays using flexible statistical distributions rather than explicitly linking them through the underlying processes that generate them, making it difficult to interpret the underlying biology and to ensure consistency across related delay estimates. Here, we develop a stochastic event-time framework built around a dynamic within-host pathogen-growth model that treats epidemiological delays as coupled outcomes of a shared biological process. By representing these key events as linked stochastic events, the framework produces internally consistent delay distributions while inferring parameters with mechanistic interpretations conditional on the assumed within-host model that govern pathogen growth, clearance, infectiousness, and symptom onset. The framework also accommodates censored and partially observed infection and symptom-onset times through a unified observation model. Across simulation studies, the framework accurately recovered generation-interval characteristics across sample sizes and disease time scales. In applications to SARS-CoV-2 and mpox transmission-pair data, the framework showed improved predictive fit relative to conventional lognormal delay models in several analyses, although the magnitude of improvement varied across datasets and observation models; it estimated shorter generation intervals for Omicron than Delta and revealed alternative within-host parameters compatible with the mpox transmission data. This mechanistic framework provides a biologically interpretable alternative to independently fitted delay distributions, yields internally consistent estimates of epidemiological delays, and establishes a foundation for integrating biological and epidemiological data to better understand, predict, and control pathogen transmission.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Test Positivity and Reported Case Rates to Estimate State-Level COVID-19 Prevalence and Seroprevalence in the United States 94%
- Sensible Long-lead Forecast of COVID-19 Epidemic Outcomes 94%
- Generalizing population RT-qPCR cycle threshold values-informed estimation of epidemiological dynamics: Impact of surveillance practices and pathogen variability 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transmission lineage dynamics and the detection of viral importation in emerging epidemics 95%
- Quantifying individual-level heterogeneity in infectiousness and susceptibility through household studies 94%
- Reimagining the serocatalytic model for infectious diseases: a case study of common coronaviruses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Selection for infectivity profiles in slow and fast epidemics, and the rise of SARS-CoV-2 variants 94%
- Quantifying antibiotic impact on within-host dynamics of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase resistance in hospitalized patients 94%
- Inference of SARS-CoV-2 generation times using UK household data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative evaluation of methodologies for estimating the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in the context of COVID-19: a simulation study 92%
- Statistical Methods for Estimating the Protective Effects of Immune Markers Using Test-Negative Designs 91%
- Misclassification of yellow fever vaccination status revealed through hierarchical Bayesian modeling 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.