K-space Optimized Spatial Temporal Architecture for Low Latency in Interventional Cardiac MRI
Buckup, M.; Mahajan, N.; Rodriguez-Soto, A. E.; Blood, J.; Hegde, S.; Schuchardt, E. L.; Printz, B.; Narayan, H. K.; Gordon, B. L.; Contijoch, F.
Show abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a recurrent neural network that operates directly on undersampled golden-angle radial k-space, enabling low-latency cardiac cine reconstruction for interventional cardiac MRI (iCMR). Methods: KOSTAL (K-space Optimized Spatial Temporal Architecture for Low latency) combines a per-coil k-space convolutional gated recurrent unit (convGRU), which learns a mask-conditioned view-sharing rule over the accumulated k-space, with an image-space recurrent module. It was trained and tested on the open-access multi-coil OCMR dataset using 10 simulated golden-angle spokes per frame against a 1000-spoke reference. Ablations varied recurrent module architecture and placement; temporal behavior was assessed using a imaging-plane transition test. Generalization was evaluated without retraining in 23 pediatric patients prospectively scanned during free-breathing using a radial golden-angle bSSFP sequence with binned XD-GRASP and clinical breath-held cine serving as references. Results: At 10 spokes per frame, KOSTAL reached a median SSIM of 0.907 (gridding: 0.622) in under 34 ms of processing time per frame. Image quality (IQ) matched gridded results formed from 7-11 times more spokes. Recurrence in k-space rather than image space accounted for most of this gain (0.891 versus [≤]0.650). IQ recovered from an abrupt plane transition in 75 ms, versus 303 ms for 200-spoke gridding. KOSTAL had the best agreement with the binned reference and the highest long-axis CNR. KOSTAL accurately tracked left-ventricular blood-pool volume (end-diastolic volume bias -0.7 mL) with a shorter lag (71 ms) than iterative reconstruction (239-287 ms). Conclusion: Learned, mask-conditioned recurrence in k-space yields high image quality at a latency compatible with interventional guidance.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficient 3D cone trajectory design for improved combined angiographic and perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling 95%
- Deep Learning Based Cardiac Cine Segmentation – Transfer Learning Application to 7T Ultrahigh-Field MRI 94%
- Spherical Echo-Planar Time-resolved Imaging (sEPTI) for rapid 3D quantitative T2* and Susceptibility imaging 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SpinFlowSim: a blood flow simulation framework for histology-informed diffusion MRI microvasculature mapping in cancer 93%
- Automated 3D reconstruction of the fetal thorax in the standard atlas space from motion-corrupted MRI stacks for 21-36 weeks GA range 93%
- Deep learning microstructure estimation of developing brains from diffusion MRI: a newborn and fetal study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducibility of 4D Flow MRI-based Personalized Cardiovascular Models; Inter-sequence, Intra-observer, and Inter-observer variability 94%
- An AI-based segmentation and analysis pipeline for high-field MR monitoring of cerebral organoids 93%
- Non-Invasive Perfusion MR Imaging of the Human Brain via Breath-Holding 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised classification of rare aortic valve malformations using unlabeled cardiac MRI sequences 91%
- EchoFM: A Pre-training and Fine-tuning Framework for Echocardiogram Videos Vision Foundation Model 91%
- Lowering the Thermal Noise Barrier in Functional Brain Mapping with Magnetic Resonance Imaging 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-Based Multi-View Echocardiographic Framework for Comprehensive Diagnosis of Pericardial Disease 90%
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 89%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.