Back

Wall stiffening is a primary contributor to motility loss in Crohn's disease: an electromechanical modeling study

Anantha Krishnan, A.; Abubaker, M.; Holland, M. A.

2026-09-25 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.09.20.752998 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fibrotic strictures are among the most disabling complications of Crohn's disease, permanently narrowing the bowel and impairing motility, yet no approved therapy reverses them. Chronic inflammation alters pacemaker-network coupling, smooth-muscle excitability, and calcium-dependent contractility, while fibrosis thickens the bowel wall, narrows the lumen, and changes tissue mechanics. The relative contributions of these coupled electrical, contractile, and structural alterations to motility loss remain unclear. To address this gap, we develop an integrated electromechanical finite-element framework for fibrostenosing Crohn's disease that couples a fibrosis-driven growth model with a FitzHugh-Nagumo electromechanical model. A full-factorial 25 design of experiments is used to quantify the relative effects of electrical diffusivity, excitation threshold, peak active stress, wall stiffness, and hypertrophic remodeling on cyclic lumen-volume deformation. Motility is quantified by the standard deviation of lumen volume over one contraction cycle. Within the parameter ranges examined, increased wall stiffness emerged as the dominant contributor to motility loss, followed by impaired smooth-muscle contractility. Changes in excitation threshold, hypertrophic remodeling, and electrical diffusivity produced substantially smaller effects. Pairwise interactions were small relative to the dominant main effects, indicating that the mechanisms contributed largely through their individual effects. Our findings suggest that limiting wall stiffening while preserving smooth-muscle contractile function may provide a therapeutic strategy for maintaining intestinal motility in fibrostenosing Crohn's disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.