Back

ProteoScopeR: A Shiny Workflow for Method Comparison and Reproducible Quantitative Proteomics Analysis

Gao, B.; Zhao, H.

2026-09-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.20.752977 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative proteomics requires decisions about normalization, missing-data handling, and statistical modeling that can change the reported results. ProteoScopeR is an R package and Shiny application that connects these decisions in a traceable workflow and complements downstream exploration in xOmicsShiny. Side-by-side comparisons expose changes in distributions, feature retention, effect estimates, and selected protein sets. An optional external artificial-intelligence assistant reviews exported evidence and proposes settings for researcher approval; statistical calculations remain in R. A group-only case study used DIA-NN-derived aqueous humor data from 69 samples and 3,667 imported protein groups. Six normalization methods and seven missing-data strategies were screened, and the approved cyclic-loess analysis compared five differential workflows. For nAMD versus pmCNV, limma and proDA selected 54 and 37 protein groups, respectively, with 31 shared selections at adjusted P < 0.05 and absolute log2 fold change [&ge;] 0.5. Input routing, scientist decisions, locked settings, and an execution receipt preserve the analysis record. These comparisons describe sensitivity to analytical choices rather than identify a universally superior method.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.