Cell-Lens: Advancing LLM Reasoning at Single-Cell Resolution
li, y.; Gao, B.; Liu, W.; Xie, J.; Tsui, T. Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fu, T.; Li, Y.
Show abstract
Recent work applies large language models (LLMs) to single-cell data, but the cell usually reaches the model as a short ranked list of genes. This list drops much of what defines a cell, so the model reasons from a partial view. Yet the information is not lost in the measurement, only in the text. Here, we introduce Cell-Lens, a training-free structured representation of the measured cell. It writes the cell as typed blocks, from paired measurements to marker-supported programs. On CellVerse, SOAR, CellPuzzles, and SC-Arena, across five model families, Cell-Lens improves performance by up to 27.1 points. It also narrows the model gap and reduces API-reported reasoning-token usage. The largest gains occur when a defining RNA marker falls out of the ranked list. In these cases, the paired protein data still capture the corresponding signal. Shuffling the added blocks removes the gain. The gain persists after selected label-associated proteins are removed. These controls link the improvement to cell-matched biological content. We also build and release CellSpectrum, a broader benchmark spanning eight sources and seven tasks with paired modalities. The gains hold there across tasks, tissues, and modalities. These results show that a better cell representation can improve single-cell reasoning without retraining the model. Code and CellSpectrum are publicly available at https://github.com/LiZaiyuan0619/Cell-Lens.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning multi-cellular representations of single-cell transcriptomics data enables characterization of patient-level disease states 94%
- Towards inferring causal gene regulatory networks from single cell expression measurements 92%
- Geometric Sketching Compactly Summarizes the Single-Cell Transcriptomic Landscape 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.