Nutritional Risk Screening and Clinical Outcomes in a Tertiary University Hospital: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study
Gerwek, M.; Walther, S.; Holdgruen, U.; Nierling, A.; Selig, L.; Stumvoll, M.; Kirsten, T.; Schloegl, H.
Show abstract
Background & objectives: Malnutrition risk is common among hospitalized patients and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, implementation of routine nutritional screening remains heterogeneous. This study assessed the distribution and implementation of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and examined associations between malnutrition risk and clinical outcomes in a tertiary university hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected electronic health record data from adult hospitalizations at the University of Leipzig Medical Center, Germany, between 2013 and 2023. The implementation of the NRS-2002 in 2017 enabled comparison of a main cohort with potential NRS assessment (2017-2023) and a pre-implementation comparison cohort (2013-2016). In the main cohort, hospitalizations were categorized according to screening results as no elevated malnutrition risk, NRS [≥]3 points, or positive initial screening without a documented final NRS assessment. Clinical outcomes included 30-day hospital readmission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Associations were assessed using unadjusted and age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression. Length of hospital stay was analyzed using Gamma regression. Time to readmission was additionally assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Results: After data preprocessing, 178,607 hospitalizations were included in the main cohort and 52,044 in the comparison cohort. In the main cohort, 5,460 hospitalizations (3.1%) had an NRS [≥]3 points, while 21,842 (12.2%) had a positive initial screening without a documented final assessment. Patients with NRS [≥]3 points had higher rates of 30-day readmission, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality and longer LOS than patients without elevated malnutrition risk. After adjustment for age and sex, NRS [≥]3 points remained associated with higher odds of 30-day readmission (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.39-1.77), ICU admission (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.63-2.11), in-hospital mortality (OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.69-4.99), and mechanical ventilation (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.08-4.38). Hospitalizations with a positive initial screening but without a documented final assessment also showed increased odds of several adverse outcomes, including 30-day readmission and in-hospital mortality. The proportion of positive initial screenings and completion of the final NRS assessment varied substantially across clinical departments. Conclusion: Elevated malnutrition risk was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in this large real-world cohort. The substantial proportion of positive initial screenings without subsequent final assessment highlights important challenges in implementing a complete nutritional screening pathway in routine hospital care.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-based differences in imaging-derived body composition and their association with clinical malnutrition in abdominal surgery patients 91%
- A Pilot Study on the Effects of Medically Supervised, Water-Only Fasting and Refeeding on Cardiometabolic Risk 90%
- The effects of time-restricted eating vs. standard dietary advice on weight, metabolic health and the consumption of processed food: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in community-based adults 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of circulating lipidomic biomarkers of malnutrition risk among oncology patients in the Total Cancer Care (TCC) Study: a Cross-Sectional Analysis 90%
- Higher energy requirement during weight-loss maintenance on a low- versus high-carbohydrate diet: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled feeding study 90%
- Evidence-Based Practice Competencies among Nutrition Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social inequalities, length of hospital stay for chronic conditions and the mediating role of comorbidity and discharge destination: A multilevel analysis of hospital administrative data linked to the population census in Switzerland 92%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 92%
- Determinants of hospital outcomes for COVID-19 infections in a large Pennsylvania Health System 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Responsibility for vitamin D supplementation of elderly care home residents in England: falling through the gap between medicine and food 91%
- Impact of a Multidisciplinary Nutritional Support Team (MNST) on Quality Improvement in Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) 90%
- Association of Periodic Fasting with Lower Severity of COVID-19 Outcomes in the SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Vaccine Era: An Observational Cohort from the INSPIRE Registry 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 92%
- Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study. 92%
- Combined association of obesity and other cardiometabolic diseases with severe COVID-19 outcomes: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 21,773 Brazilian adult and elderly inpatients 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.