Back

Phosphorylation of the Kv7.4 B helix reorganizes calmodulin interactions and reduces PIP2 binding

Phan, P.; Okose, C.; Sapkota, D.; Munyao, W.; Girodat, D.; Archer, C.

2026-09-22 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.09.18.752758 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Voltage-gated Kv7 (KCNQ, M-type) potassium channels regulate cellular excitability through interactions with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2;) and calmodulin (CaM). The distal B helix of Kv7.2-5 channels contains a conserved protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation site, suggesting that phosphorylation may regulate channel activity by altering CaM- and PIP2;-dependent mechanisms. Here, we investigated the effects of phosphorylation of Thr552 within the Kv7.4 B helix using electrophysiology, biophysical assays, NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations. Phosphomimetic substitution of Thr552 produced a loss-of-function phenotype characterized by reduced current density and a depolarizing shift in voltage-dependent activation without altering channel surface expression. Biophysical studies demonstrated that phosphorylation produced only modest effects on overall CaM association. However, NMR spectroscopy revealed phosphorylation-dependent changes in apoCaM interactions, and molecular dynamics simulations identified remodeling of the local interaction network surrounding the distal B-helix polybasic (KRK motif) region. In contrast, phosphorylation markedly reduced PIP2; binding to both the isolated B helix and CaM-associated Kv7.4 regulatory complexes. Mutation of the distal B-helix KRK motif similarly impaired PIP2; binding, identifying this region as an important determinant of lipid recognition. Together, these findings support a model in which phosphorylation of Thr552 suppresses Kv7.4 activity primarily by reducing PIP2; interactions while reorganizing, rather than disrupting, CaM binding. These results identify Thr552 as a critical regulatory site linking phosphorylation-dependent signaling to Kv7.4 channel gating.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.