Back

Strength of developmental carry-over varies continuously with environmental conditions in a wild bird population

Satarkar, D.; Lopez-Idiaquez, D.; Bliard, L.; Sepil, I.; Sheldon, B. C.

2026-09-22 ecology
10.64898/2026.09.18.752706 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early-life phenotypes frequently predict adult phenotypes through developmental 'silver-spoon' carry-over effects, but how strongly and under what circumstances? Using 40 years of individual-based data from a great tit (Parus major) population, we used covariance reaction norms to understand how the natal-to-adult body mass association shifts across temperature, rainfall, and population density gradients during both life stages. We show that the natal-adult mass correlation is substantial (r {approx} 0.7) but strongly environment-dependent. Reaction norm shapes across climatic and density axes point to distinct mechanisms, including compensatory growth under benign adult conditions and density-dependent modulation of early-life differences. We further show that the conditions experienced in adulthood largely drive these patterns and determine whether early-life advantages are retained, even when explicitly tested within an environmental-matching paradigm. Decomposing the correlation using 38 generations of pedigree data revealed no evidence of gene-by-environment interactions. Instead, the observed phenotypic correlation reaction norms could be attributed almost entirely to environmentally-sensitive non-genetic individual differences. Overall, our findings show that climatic and demographic shifts can substantially reshape developmental carry-over without altering the genetic architecture tying body mass across life stages, with implications for how reliably early-life mass can predict individual quality and adult traits in wild animal populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.