Back

Determinants of Radiation Exposure and Radiation Overexposure During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Real-World Study of 10,634 Procedures With Development of a Pragmatic Radiation-Alert Risk Score

digne, f.; Darmon, A.; stratiev, v.; Abdellaoui, M.; Dreyfus, J.; taramasso, m.; Nappi, F.; Nejjari, M.

2026-09-21 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.09.18.26363451 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Ionizing radiation is inherent to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and may reach radiation-alert thresholds during complex procedures. Real-world data translating dose determinants into a usable planning-stage alert tool remain scarce. Aims: To determine the prevalence and predictors of radiation overexposure (RO) during PCI and to develop a pragmatic radiation-alert risk score usable before substantial dose accumulates. Methods: We analysed 10,634 consecutive PCI procedures performed between January 2008 and May 2018. Complex PCI was defined as unprotected left main, rotational atherectomy, chronic total occlusion (CTO), or bifurcation/trifurcation PCI. The composite RO endpoint was a dose-area product >500 Gy{middle dot}cm2, cumulative reference-point air kerma (AK) >5 Gy, or fluoroscopy time >60 minutes. A pragmatic score was built from early procedural variables. Results: Overall, 3,457 procedures (32.5%) were complex, and RO occurred in 99 (0.93%). Complex PCI showed higher RO rates than standard PCI (2.1% vs 0.4%; p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, body mass index (BMI), male sex, CTO, rotational atherectomy, bifurcation, and treatment of [&ge;]2 vessels independently predicted higher AK. A pragmatic score derived from early clinical and procedural variables showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.772; 95% bootstrap CI 0.725-0.818) and was well calibrated (Brier score 0.0091; observed-to-expected ratio 0.994) for the composite RO endpoint. Conclusions: Radiation-alert thresholds were exceeded in approximately 1% of PCI procedures, but fivefold more often during complex PCI. A pragmatic, internally assessed score based on early procedural variables identified high-risk cases with good discrimination, supporting planning-stage risk stratification to activate dose-sparing strategies before substantial radiation has accumulated.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.