Prospective evaluation of basic life support interventions for foreign body airway obstructions: A pilot population-based cohort study
Dunne, C. L.; Tea, J.; Rivera, B.; Blancahrd, I. E.; Patocka, C.; Sauro, K. M.; McRae, A.
Show abstract
Background: Foreign body airway obstruction (FBAO) is a life-threatening emergency; however, bystander treatment recommendations rely on retrospective data. We evaluated the feasibility of a population-based prospective cohort study of FBAO interventions. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational pilot study in Alberta, Canada, between November 2025 and April 2026. We identified individuals with out-of-hospital FBAO who called emergency medical services or attended an emergency department using a validated health-record case definition. Participants were stratified into adults and children (aged>2 years) and younger children (aged< 2 years) cohorts. The primary outcome was included cases per month, with several secondary feasibility (proportion of eligible cases included, data completeness) and clinical outcomes (FBAO relief, survival to acute care discharge, favourable neurological outcome, intervention-associated injuries). Results: Among 5,208 screened encounters, 147 FBAO cases were identified. Of these, 91 adults and children (89.2%) and 39 young children (86.7%) were enrolled. Mean recruitment was 15.2 participants/month (SD=1.1) in the adult and child cohort, exceeding the predefined feasibility threshold ([≥]13/month), and 6.5 participants/month (SD=1.3) in the young child cohort, meeting the amber-zone criterion (6-8/month). Data completeness exceeded 90% across all participants. In adults and children, bystander intervention relieved the obstruction in 59 cases (66.3%), and 80(87.9%) survived to acute care discharge. In young children, bystander intervention relieved the obstruction in 33 cases (84.6%); all survived with favourable neurological outcomes. Conclusions: Prospectively identifying and recruiting individuals with FBAO is feasible using population-based prehospital and emergency department records. These findings support a larger adequately powered prospective cohort study comparing the effectiveness and safety of FBAO interventions.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 94%
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 94%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing consensus on emergency department interventions that could be conducted in sub-acute care settings for non-emergent paramedic transported visits: A RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study 93%
- Derivation And Validation Of A Clinical Score To Predict Death Among Non-Palliative COVID-19 Patients Presenting To Emergency Departments: The Ccedrrn COVID Mortality Score 91%
- Heterogeneity in risk, testing and outcome of COVID-19 across outbreak settings in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: an observational study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality and outcomes after decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury 93%
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 91%
- Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers following Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 90%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 89%
- Quantitative assessment of motor neglect 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.