Epileptic discharges are classified as generalized paroxysmal fast activity with low expert agreement: findings from an international survey
Kampman, S. L.; Warren, A. E.; Tokatly Latzer, I.; Stamm, M.; Rolston, J. D.; Archer, J. S.; Tobochnik, S.; Peters, J. M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe current International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) guidelines for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) mandate the presence of generalized paroxysmal fast activity (GPFA) on EEG. However, GPFA is not necessarily restricted to LGS and has been described in, among others, idiopathic generalized epilepsies. A clear definition for GPFA is currently lacking, hampering research into its utility as a diagnostic or treatment biomarker. Here, we assessed expert agreement in the interpretation of GPFA to explore feasibility of a consensus-based definition. MethodsWe internationally distributed a two-part survey on GPFA to EEG experts. First, participants completed thirteen questions gauging their preferred clinical and EEG criteria for GPFA, including duration, frequency, amplitude and topography. Second, participants classified the presence versus absence of GPFA in eleven EEG clips, while blinded to clinical context, from patients with LGS, other epilepsies, and physiological variants. Results162 respondents, predominantly from North America and Europe, completed the survey. 87% considered GPFA to also occur in epilepsies other than LGS. Considerable heterogeneity was present on defining duration, spectral frequency, amplitude and topographic distribution of GPFA. Particularly poor agreement was seen for lower limits of duration and frequency, with no single response option receiving a majority consensus (36% and 30% agreement, respectively). Similarly, the degree of agreement on interpretations was highly variable across real-world EEG clips. SignificanceMarked discrepancies exist in the EEG identification and clinical interpretation of GPFA, undermining its utility as a potential biomarker in research and clinical trials of LGS and other epilepsies. The findings also highlight the need to establish a consensus-based and eventually evidence-informed definition to formally operationalize the clinical and EEG criteria for GPFA. Key pointsO_LIGeneralized paroxysmal fast activity (GPFA) is variably defined in the literature, limiting its utility as a diagnostic or treatment biomarker C_LIO_LIIn this international survey (n = 162 respondents, 25 countries) we found limited agreement on GPFAs defining features and on interpretation of fast activity on EEG clips C_LIO_LI87% of respondents considered GPFA to occur in epilepsies other than Lennox-Gastaut syndrome C_LIO_LIPending further elucidation of the pathophysiology underlying GPFA or its computational characterization (i.e., to inform a biologically-or evidence-based definition), we underscore the need for an interim consensus-based definition C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ambulatory Video EEG extended to 10 days: A retrospective review of a large database of ictal events 96%
- Internal and External Validation of Comprehensive High-Frequency Activity Biomarkers for Epilepsy Surgery 94%
- Amplitude of high frequency oscillations as a biomarker of the seizure onset zone 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Interictal waking and sleep electrophysiological properties of the thalamus in focal epilepsies 94%
- Blinded study: prospectively defined high frequency oscillations predict seizure outcome in individual patients 94%
- Effects of spatial sampling on network alterations in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Can routine EEG be enough? 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.