Newly identified COPD GWAS protein interactors reveal a potential disease network module
Deritei, D.; Inuzuka, H.; Zhang, C.; Castaldi, P. J.; Asara, J. M.; Madha-Krause, S.; Moritz, R. L.; Cho, M. H.; Glass, K.; Wei, W.; Silverman, E. K.
Show abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex, heterogeneous disease influenced by genetic and environmental factors. However, the interactions between COPD risk genes and their collective role in COPD susceptibility remain largely elusive. We hypothesize that the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of genes associated with COPD risk can provide molecular insight into the mechanisms of COPD pathogenesis. Methods: We used affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) to detect protein-protein interactions of six well-established COPD GWAS gene products (AGER, FAM13A, FBXO38, HHIP, IREB2, MFAP2) in two relevant lung cell lines (IMR90, 16HBE). These genes are located in significant COPD GWAS regions, and their physiological role in COPD has been previously confirmed by functional studies. We analyzed the impact of the newly identified interactions in contextual, cell type-specific PPI networks built from the combination of publicly available PPI data (HUBRIS) and cell type-specific gene expression data. Results: Using AP-MS, we identified 482 unique interactors across 701 newly identified protein interactions with the six GWAS gene products in at least one of the cell lines (AGER: 122, FAM13A: 83, FBXO38: 71, HHIP: 108, IREB2: 8, MFAP2: 309). Subsequent network analysis incorporating these new PPIs with public PPI databases revealed: (1) the new interactions significantly reduce the network distance between known COPD GWAS gene products; (2) 5.2% of the newly identified interactors are differentially abundant between COPD cases and controls in lung proteomic data from the Lung Tissue Research Consortium (LTRC); and (3) 41 (14.3%) of the newly identified interactors were directly connected to more than one of the six COPD GWAS genes. We identified a tightly connected core network of COPD GWAS gene products and protein biomarkers with intersecting signals; this network consists of 8 proteins, including 5 of the 6 GWAS gene products (AGER, FAM13A, HHIP, FBXO38, and MFAP2) as well as CAVIN1, TGM2, and HSPA1A. Conclusions: By combining AP-MS experimental data, multiple types of "omics" data, and network analysis, we have constructed a disease network module for COPD. This module can be a foundation for understanding the collective influence of COPD GWAS gene products in disease pathogenesis.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Latent transforming growth factor binding protein-2 (LTBP2), an IPF biomarker of clinical decline, promotes TGF-beta signaling and lung fibrosis in mice 90%
- Sexually distinct multi omic responses to progressive endurance exercise training in the rat lung. Findings from MoTrPAC 89%
- Targeting ATP12A, a non-gastric proton pump alpha subunit, for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lung proteomic biomarkers associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 96%
- Sorted-Cell Proteomics Reveals an AT1-Associated Epithelial Cornification Phenotype and Suggests Endothelial Redox Imbalance in Human Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia 92%
- The lung extracellular matrix protein landscape in severe early-onset and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Crosslinking Proteomics Indicates Effects of Simvastatin on the TLR2 interactome and Reveals ACTR1A as a Novel Regulator of the TLR2 Signal Cascade 90%
- Stress-induced changes in the S-palmitoylation and S-nitrosylation of synaptic proteins 88%
- Improved peptide search for identification of SUMO and sequence-based modifications, in MaxSBM 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.