Leakage-controlled benchmarking reveals generalization limits of deep learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction
Wang, L.; Cheng, J.
Show abstract
To address widespread data leakage and inconsistent evaluation in protein-ligand affinity prediction, we introduce PLABench, a leakage-controlled and target-centric benchmarking framework that enables standardized comparison across sequence- and structure-based models. We benchmark nine deep learning methods across blind CASP16 targets, leakage-controlled ChEMBL35 sets, and established Davis and KIBA datasets under rigorous data split settings, standardizing structural input via AlphaFold3 to ensure fair comparison. Although pretrained structure-based models achieve the highest overall accuracy, they show severe target-dependent variability, and increasing structural fidelity from predicted to experimental conformations yields no consistent gains. Meanwhile, sequence-based approaches surpass some structure-based methods on select targets, and protein family-level evaluations reveal uneven performance across families and substantial inter-model complementarity obscured by aggregate metrics. These findings demonstrate that training scale and structural input alone cannot guarantee cross-target generalization, highlighting the need for context-aware interaction modeling. PLABench provides an extensible open-source platform to facilitate these developments.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.