Back

Biophysical modeling reveals how recording geometry shapes representations of cortical activity

Diaz-Montiel, A. A.; Willis, J. A.; Unal, G.; Abrego, A. M.; Kajikawa, Y.; Mosher, J. C.; Schroeder, C. E.; Dura-Bernal, S.; Seymour, J. P.; Neymotin, S. A.

2026-09-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.17.752414 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extracellular electrophysiological recordings reflect both the organization of neural activity and the geometry through which that activity is sampled. Here, we used biophysical modeling and experimental recordings from the macaque auditory cortex to determine how cortical activity is transformed across neural sources, extracellular signals, and recording geometries. In a biophysically detailed thalamocortical model, four separately instantiated cortical-column conditions spanning graded thalamic recruitment exhibited a graded response hierarchy across local field potential, current-source density, and multiunit activity, despite signal-dependent differences in the contributions of cortical neuronal populations. We then arranged independently simulated cortical columns into controlled spatial configurations and sampled the same underlying sources using virtual linear laminar and Directional and Scalable (DiSc) electrode arrays. The linear geometry primarily represented variation along cortical depth, whereas DiSc additionally represented circumferential variation associated with lateral source organization, demonstrating that recording geometry determines which spatial dimensions of common underlying activity are represented in extracellular measurements. Experimental recordings obtained with the corresponding geometries were consistent with these model-derived predictions: broadband-noise responses exhibited spatial organization shared across tone-evoked responses in both multidimensional DiSc maps and laminar profiles, despite substantial variation in frequency-dependent response magnitude across penetrations. Together, these results show that extracellular measurements represent an interaction between biological source organization and recording geometry. Biophysical forward modeling therefore provides a framework for determining which features of underlying circuit organization remain identifiable after extracellular sampling and for relating neural-interface design to the dimensions of cortical activity accessible experimentally.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.